Unanswered [2] | Urgent [0]
  

Posts by Sachin341 [Suspended]
Name: Sachin Gupta
Joined: Feb 23, 2023
Last Post: Feb 24, 2023
Threads: 2
Posts: 3  
From: India
School: Delhi University

Displayed posts: 5
sort: Oldest first   Latest first  | 
Sachin341   
Feb 23, 2023
Writing Feedback / Task 2: Some people believe that governments should take large proportions of people's salary [4]

Some people believe that governments should take large proportions of people's salary to develop public services, while others say that it is a bad thing.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion?



Some people say that the authorities should charge high taxes on the income of individuals for the development of basic facilities, whereas others believe it is not appropriate. Although I support heavy taxes because it will ease the economical burden of governments, high rates of taxes can result in more financial pressure on taxpayers.

Governments can use the collected tax money to construct and improve the fundamental infrastructure. Amenities such as rail networks, highways, and academic institutions require huge initial capital investments. Though governments hold billions of dollars in reserves, it is difficult for them to pay these enormous amounts alone. Therefore, support in the form of taxes paid by the citizens of a country can greatly lower the expenditure incurred by authorities. For example, Indians pay fifteen percent additional tax known as the "Education Cess" to reduce the total budget outlay of the government. However, I think that imposing high taxes is sometimes not suitable because this money can be easily misused by some politicians.

Large amounts of tax, on the other hand, can put unnecessary stress on a person by cutting down his savings. This is to say that a mediocre employee produces an average salary, and a little is left after further deductions of the basic expenses. Such savings will be nominal if there are large taxation rates. Furthermore, future planning, including investment for retirement, luxurious lifestyle, and children's higher education, would be impossible with limited savings. In Sweden, for instance, residents have to pay 57% of their remuneration as taxes, and due to that many Swedish people live under a huge debt of unpaid tax dues.

To conclude, increased taxes can aid the governing bodies financially by lowering their overall cost. Nevertheless, I believe that charging excessive taxes can depress individuals by reducing their important savings.
Sachin341   
Feb 24, 2023
Writing Feedback / [Ielts 1] The proportion of school boys, based on two groups of age, who took part in various sports [3]

I'm not an expert but I think there are some major errors in this report
1. The data is not rounded off pretty appropriately, and this can create a confusion, for example, ..... with almost 90%, which nearly doubled the figure for cricket..... however the real figure is 87.

2. There is not proper use of plurals..... the boys aged from 12 to 16.
3. There are also wrong word choice.......common sport among this boy age group
Sachin341   
Feb 24, 2023
Writing Feedback / Task 2: Many people think that it is a waste of money to save animals of endangered species like the [2]

Many people think that it is a waste of money to save animals of endangered species like the tiger or the blue whale.

Do you agree or disagree with this view?


A few members of society think that the attempt to conserve animals that are at the verge of extinction is a complete waste of money. However, I disagree with this belief because due to their absolute importance in the food chain and a fundamental right to live, it becomes crucial to try and save these endangered species.

Every being on this planet has a basic right to be alive and as the alpha species of the Earth, it is the moral responsibility of humans to do so. Moreover, when these endangered animal species are left under safe environment and observation, chances of their survival get multifold. This is to say that this special kind of assistance can only be provided by professionals and nobody else. Apart from that, it is now possible to create genetically improved animals so they would not have to face extinction. Due to such aforesaid reasons, it is justified to use money for the preservation of the endangered species.

Beside that, some animals are on the top of the food chain and are vital for ecological systems. For instance, a tiger feeds on deer, which eat grass or other vegetation. If tiger went extinct for some reason, the numbers of deer would boom and grasslands will suffer as a result of overgrazing. In other words, if the elite member of a habitat dies, other animals depended on that particular species would witness harsh consequences. Therefore, it is evident to support and save animals that are anticipated to disappear in the near future so that the environment and its other members can flourish peacefully.

In conclusion, a number of people believe that the conservation of animals that are endangered is wastage of public funds. Nevertheless, I strongly disagree with this idea because animals are essential to our environment, and they have a right to be alive just like any human.
Need Writing or Editing Help?
Fill out one of these forms:

Graduate Writing / Editing:
GraduateWriter form ◳

Best Essay Service:
CustomPapers form ◳

Excellence in Editing:
Rose Editing ◳

AI-Paper Rewriting:
Robot Rewrite ◳

Academic AI Writer:
Custom AI Writer ◳