Writing Feedback / Death penalty for or against; We should abolish DEATH PENALTY! [NEW]

Death penalty appears in many countries from advanced nations to developing ones. Some people believe that this policy has positive impacts on social security while others claim that the violation of the human right is a downside of applying punishment. I totally agree with the latter for following reasons:

Firstly, it is believed that this policy is conducive to social security. The fact is that those people who take lives of others deserve the highest punishment and victim's families feel fair. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that no sooner have judge carried out this penalty, they realize that the executed turn out be innocent. Another point is that by dint of this punishment is the human right violated. The truth is that everybody, despite making serious mistakes, should be given the chance to live and correct their mistakes as there goes a saying "to err is human".

Secondly, it is commonly seen that people's awareness and warnings increase is other benefit of death penalty. The natural rule is believed that by no means do government applies this policy, the crime rate decrease. In contrast, it is believed that owing to applying this punishment, the government is doing the similar crime. Another point is that after executing this penalty, parents of criminals suffer mentally painful while hardly do the people who give decision might feel serenity in their soul. Put it simply, the activity of killing people is conducive to extremely pain in human's soul.

In a nut shell, I strongly believe that we should abolish this punishment for humanitarian and human right.

Please correct this essay for me.

Writing Feedback / Setting up Cameras in public places us a controversial issue! [2]

The issue of cameras are setting in public areas remain controversial. Some people believe that the appearance of cameras has positive impacts on social security while others claim that the violation of people's privacy is downside of setting cameras in public. I vigorously agree with the former idea because of its positive influences on government's finance and prevention of crime:

Firstly, it is argued that the activity of setting cameras in public places can endanger people's privacy. The likelihood is that the appearance of cameras in everywhere can cause people's lack of comfort. However, it is irrefutable that no sooner are cameras set than the government might save more cost of management instead of hiring human. Besides, only by using cameras do people feel greater sense of safety while others' self-awareness of their actions is higher. In other words, the countries setting cameras have good impacts on social security.

Secondly, opponents argue that another disadvantage is to raise cost of management. It is likely that people just behave under supervision of cameras. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that by dint of camera, police might use the records of cameras to find out true criminals on offence. Also, by no means do cameras provide traffic police easier access to arrest people who violated traffic law. In a word, criminals and traffic violators rate decrease is benefit of cameras.

All things considered, I strongly believe that cameras support effectively in social management for the government, ensure social security.

Please, correct for me!