Writing Feedback / People who do not prefer change are pessimistic and who like changes- optimistic [6]

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same thing and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always good thing. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

The statement above is controversial. Some people do not prefer the change while some do. People who do not prefer change falls into pessimistic people while who prefer change are optimistic people. Pessimistic people are static in nature. They are happy within their boundary. People who do not want changes have their own limitation and they grow within that limitation. They are satisfied people. They do not want momentum in life. They are contained with whatever they have. These people set a target in their life and spend their whole life pursuing it and when they get, they are satisfied. They like to live within their comfort zone. For example, most of the bank cashier their main job is to collect, count, give and take of cash. They work their whole life doing same routine job, there are some exception but it's rare. Most people believe that staying secure and maintaining the current circumstance is the best way to live safer.

Nevertheless, many people do need change. They have no boundaries, no limitation. They accept and welcome changes. Due to the fact that change brings opportunities, they can learn different new things in life some people prefer change. For example, these days most of the leading companies encourage their employees to rotate jobs. Job rotation makes their employee learn new things and make them more competent.

Hence, I personally believe changes are inevitable. We cannot avoid change. Since whole world is changing hasty why should I remain unchanged? To become competent enough and to accept every challenge that comes in today's world one should accept change.

Writing Feedback / High salaries to sportsmen or other important professions; equally hard work [5]

Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justifies while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions. *39*

It is the fact that successful sports professionals earn lots of more money than people in other important professions. I strongly favor to the fact.

Yes, successful sports person earns lots of money than others but that money are the pay back of their hardcore work in the field of sports, dedication towards the game and having the feelings of sportsmanship. I think to become a successful sportsman both mental and physical balance is needed. Unlike doctors and engineers or other important professions becoming successful sports person is not just learnt from going to training schools rather it's an inbuilt talent that one should have and the dedication. For this the phrase rightly matched that Leaders are born not made.

There is no doubt that paying high salaries to sportsmen is controversial subject as becoming doctors and engineers or other important professions also equally needed hardwork and dedication. Also its due to those doctors and engineers sports men can have the knowledge of how much effort they can put in their body and it's entirely from engineers that sportsmen knew the exact facts and figure of measurement.

Nevertheless, Successful sportsmen not only become famous by their names also they are the pride for the nation. They play a vital role in economic boost up of country. For example Maradona is popular not just from his name but we also know he is from Australia. Sachin Tendulkar, Pele, David Beckham, Ronaldo, Michael Jordan and lots more are few examples.

Hence, I strongly believe that paying successful sportsperson high is totally justificable.