Writing Feedback / IELTS-TASK2 internet contains information however sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong [3]

Currently, the application of cutting-edge technology, such as internet has significantly improved social communication. As result, data becomes accessible to all individuals .Yet, it is questioned whether data is considered as dependable content or incredible. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that information in internet is unreliable sources.

There are numerous substantiations that demonstrate data in internet is trustworthy origin. Governmental websites are an example of certified input. All information is provided by officials, so there is no doubt that this information is reliable. Further proof is education websites.

There are a number of websites which conduct scientific researches such as Exploratorium and forum-network. All data in these websites are produced by laboratories. For this reason, it can be trusty.

However, Although there are a number of reliable sources of data in internet, perfidious information is intensely present. First, gossip and rumors are prevalent in internet sites. A massive number of news and magazine sites use this technique to seek for fame. Therefore, this data is seen as deceptive method to mislead individuals. Second, creating new websites is flexible to all individuals. They have ability to create their own websites without monitoring. Consequently, all data that is created in those sites do not have a reference to be documented, so it is unbelievable provenance.

In conclusion, substantial amount of information in internet is more likely to be deceiving and not authentic, resulted in searching for celebrity and finance.

I will appreciate that if you give my the possible score for my essay (ielts score)

Writing Feedback / Handwriting errors, undermined writing skills - these are effects of using computers and smartphones [2]

IELTS-TASK 2 the influence of new technology on writing and reading skill

utilizing new technology such as smart phones and computers has significantly enhanced writing and reading skills. Consequently, a massive number of individuals who use this device have obtained high promotion in their works or high score at their exams. Yet, there is a question as to whether using computer or cellular phone has a contributing factor to the development of writing and reading skills or not. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that utilizing modern device such as computers and smart phones has a prominent role in improving writing and reading skills.

There are a number of proofs that substantiate using computer and smarts phone improve writing and reading skills. First, Search engines such as Google or Yahoo assist individuals to discover various sources of data on the internet quickly. Thus, they increase reading skills among individuals and provide them with curiosity to discover more references and facilitate access to variety of reading materials. Further evidence can be seen in computer programs such as word processor or Microsoft word. These programs are used to contract the length of writing without errors. Many individuals use this program to write novels or books in a short duration of time. However, in the past, they used to write novels or books by hand after that they rewrote them on Typewriter to print them. As a consequence, it took a long period of time and boost disappointment among them. Currently, using these programs can encourage individuals to write more piece of writing and promote writing skills among them.

However, although utilizing modern technology such as computer and cellular phones are more likely to increase reading and writing skills among individuals, adverse effects can be intensely present. Handwriting errors can be prevalent among individuals, relied on programs on computers or smart phones. Excessive dependence on modern devices in writing can undermine writing skills. Moreover, individuals, based largely on modern devices, do not have the ability to write a letter by their hand. As result, handwriting might be in extreme danger of extinction. Furthermore, absence of this device, it can trigger embarrassment among writer because they do not have the ability to write by their hand.

In conclusion, despite the fact that a new technology such as smart phone and computer has negative impact, it has dramatically evolved the methodology of writing and reading in a contemporary era.

Writing Feedback / Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. [3]

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Smoking is considered to be an insidious killer. It has great detrimental effects on both smokers and non-smokers. As such, certain individuals believe that smoking should be banned in public settings. I believe that smoking has harmful effects, so it should be prohibited.

There are numerous reasons that bolster the notion that smoking should be banned in public places. Firstly, it triggers an uncomfortable situation such as a loathsome smelling to individuals who set nearby smokers. Public areas are seen as a perfect place to people gather and entertain their leisure time and breathe pure air. Another reason, it causes chronic diseases such as cancer. Non-smokers are more likely to be infected by cancer when they seat beside smokers. It has negative effects on human's health. Third reason, in public areas, smokers frequently throws their lit cigarettes in different areas and do not concentrate what will occur. Lighted cigarettes usually pose fires. In the aftermath of fires, public places will be destroyed by fires. As result, they prevent people to assemble in these settings. Smoking should be prohibited because it has adverse impacts on non-smokers.

However, Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, each individual has a freedom to seat or carry out favorite activities in public areas. Therefore, smokers have a right to smoke tobacco in such settings. Non-smokers do not require to seat around smokers. Consequently, they do not disturb non-smokers. Second reason, exposing to smoking for a short period of time has no side effects on non-smokers. As such, non-smokers have the ability to conduct various activities with smokers in public places.

In conclusion, smoking has disgusted smelling and cause harmful consequences to healthy individuals, so it should be banned.