jennyness
Dec 31, 2009
Undergraduate / 'Many things to do' - Stanford Intellectual Vitality: Research [3]
Yeah, I didn't think it answered the prompt either. It was an old recycled essay.
Anyways, please tell me if these two essays work and which version is better.
---------------
More than 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans. The remaining .1 percent heavily influences the ways in which humans respond to disease, drugs and the environment. More importantly, this tiny percentage codes for physical appearance. Just .1 percent of DNA makes me look different from President Obama or Bill Gates. Such a small percentage give rise to discrimination, stereotypes, and hate crimes around the world.
Physical appearance has dictated the worth of a person for centuries. Anybody who was not white was labeled inferior by the Europeans. African Americans were made into slaves because their skin tone was black. Asians worked the railroads because their skin tone was yellow. Indians were rampaged and taken from their homes becuase their skin tone was brown. Even now, society idolizes appearances. Girls need to get thinner; guys buffer. Just look at the hype around thin models and hot celebrities.
Why let such a little percentage rule our lives? This tiny amount has caused so much conflict and strife in the world. The value of a person should not be dictated by the .1 percent that is different[them]. Instead, it should be based on the inside, where everyone is (on average) 99/9% the same.
Those ages have passed. Our environment has drastically changed. No longer do we worry about being killed by others. Judging by appearance only brings negative consequences; we misread people when we skim the surface instead of delving deep down. Having a mere .1 percent rule our lives seems silly.
------ OR ------
More than 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans. The remaining .1 percent heavily influences the ways in which humans respond to the environment, disease, and drugs disease, drugs, and the environment. More importantly, this tiny percentage codes for physical appearance. Just .1 percent of DNA makes me look different from President Obama or Bill Gates. Such a small percentage give rise to discrimination, stereotypes, and a large portion of hate crimes.
Physical appearance has dictated the worth of a person for centuries. Slavery was based on the color of a person's skin. Anybody who was not white was labeled inferior by the Europeans. Although African Americans gained freedom in 1860 after the Civil War, it wasn't until the Civil Rights movement in the 1900s that blacks gained some semblance of equality. Even now, society idolizes appearances. Girls need to get thinner; guys buffer. Just look at all those thin models and hot celebrities.
Why let such a little percentage rule our lives? However, through an evolutionary standpoint, judging by appearance makes sense. Our ancestors needed to make split-second decisions in a world governed by "kill or be killed." Those that could quickly come to a conclusion about whether or not to bash in the new person's head lived longer.
Those ages have passed. Our environment has drastically changed. No longer do we worry about being killed by others. Judging by appearance only brings negative consequences. We misread people when we skim the surface instead of delving deep down. Having a mere .1 percent rule our lives seems silly.
Yeah, I didn't think it answered the prompt either. It was an old recycled essay.
Anyways, please tell me if these two essays work and which version is better.
---------------
More than 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans. The remaining .1 percent heavily influences the ways in which humans respond to disease, drugs and the environment. More importantly, this tiny percentage codes for physical appearance. Just .1 percent of DNA makes me look different from President Obama or Bill Gates. Such a small percentage give rise to discrimination, stereotypes, and hate crimes around the world.
Physical appearance has dictated the worth of a person for centuries. Anybody who was not white was labeled inferior by the Europeans. African Americans were made into slaves because their skin tone was black. Asians worked the railroads because their skin tone was yellow. Indians were rampaged and taken from their homes becuase their skin tone was brown. Even now, society idolizes appearances. Girls need to get thinner; guys buffer. Just look at the hype around thin models and hot celebrities.
Why let such a little percentage rule our lives? This tiny amount has caused so much conflict and strife in the world. The value of a person should not be dictated by the .1 percent that is different[them]. Instead, it should be based on the inside, where everyone is (on average) 99/9% the same.
Those ages have passed. Our environment has drastically changed. No longer do we worry about being killed by others. Judging by appearance only brings negative consequences; we misread people when we skim the surface instead of delving deep down. Having a mere .1 percent rule our lives seems silly.
------ OR ------
More than 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans. The remaining .1 percent heavily influences the ways in which humans respond to the environment, disease, and drugs disease, drugs, and the environment. More importantly, this tiny percentage codes for physical appearance. Just .1 percent of DNA makes me look different from President Obama or Bill Gates. Such a small percentage give rise to discrimination, stereotypes, and a large portion of hate crimes.
Physical appearance has dictated the worth of a person for centuries. Slavery was based on the color of a person's skin. Anybody who was not white was labeled inferior by the Europeans. Although African Americans gained freedom in 1860 after the Civil War, it wasn't until the Civil Rights movement in the 1900s that blacks gained some semblance of equality. Even now, society idolizes appearances. Girls need to get thinner; guys buffer. Just look at all those thin models and hot celebrities.
Why let such a little percentage rule our lives? However, through an evolutionary standpoint, judging by appearance makes sense. Our ancestors needed to make split-second decisions in a world governed by "kill or be killed." Those that could quickly come to a conclusion about whether or not to bash in the new person's head lived longer.
Those ages have passed. Our environment has drastically changed. No longer do we worry about being killed by others. Judging by appearance only brings negative consequences. We misread people when we skim the surface instead of delving deep down. Having a mere .1 percent rule our lives seems silly.