Writing Feedback / Task 2: International travel is becoming cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their [2]

effect of multinational tourism

Nowadays, traveling abroad is becoming popular in modern life. While it may be disliked by some people, but foreign trips are becoming affordable than before and more countries wide-open doors for explorers. It is a debatable issue of whether international travels are good or bad. My essay is going to discuss both sides of the issue.

There are many advantages of outbound travel, to begin with, tourism contributes to an increased national economy. Many countries around the world, tourism becoming key economic sectors for long-standing about 40% to 60% proportion of the national economy. It also promotes the development of foreign trading industries.

Besides that, tourism is a media vehicle to advertise for host countries like cuisine, culture, society...The development of tourism abroad is important for international economic relations such as exchange contracts between host countries, travel agencies, oversea tourism organizations.

Over than that, tourism creates opportunities for employment solutions. Tourism promotes the growth of small and large businesses or family-owned: transportation services, souvenir shops, restaurants, tour guide agencies ...and relevant industries.

However, there are disadvantages to this issue. The development of tourism has badly impacted our environment: heavy traffic, tourist activities, construction infrastructures... it directly impacts the quality life of humans and wildlife. Moreover, the host country's traditional culture may be devalued. Society becomes more complex.

In summary, I would concede that international travel does come with some harmful effects. Even though the benefits created by it far outweigh the disadvantages. Overall, I am convinced that we should promote international tourism and meanwhile the host country's government should take action to well control bad effects.

Writing Feedback / Task 2: Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as [3]

teaching life skills need to be considered at schools

Whether students should be taught academic subjects so that they can pass exams, and life skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught poses a matter of controversy. In my opinion, I party agree with the statement for following the reasons:

Firstly, Study academic knowledge at school can help students develop their potential, social knowledge as well as their behavior. For example, of some subject like Math, History, Civic Education which there is no better place can help them than school.

Secondly, Pass the exams with excellent score is also advantage for their future to choose a career or have a chance to study abroad or even get a scholarship. For example, as many Vietnamese students get fully government scholarship from others country. Or nowadays most of big companies offer jobs with high benefits for excellent students working in their company.

However, studying life skills is also not less important such as: cooking or dressing. Gaining these necessary skills helps them more independent and confident at anyplace they stay. For example, when they go to study abroad or travel alone without parents help, they need to make their own decision, know how make a healthy meal, or how to impress others by dressing. So, Open life skill classes is encouraged at school. It's also help students reduce their stress after study academic subjects time.

In the end, Academic knowledge should be taught but life skills also need to be considered at school for student comprehensive development.