jeovanshadow
Dec 25, 2009
Undergraduate / 'invigorating history' - Stanford (intellectual vitality) - Berlin [3]
I did not find history invigorating before. It was not appealing to me because of the sense that events had happened so long ago, and because I enjoy the more concise, exact outcomes of science which history is famous for not having.
Hey there,
I like your response very much. I just have one suggestion. In the sentence above, I do not think you should include your liking of "consicise, exact outcomes of science". Mainly because it is contradicting to the rest of your response. I can clearly see why you have included it, but i think that the essay will be just as strong with out it. :D Instead of saying.. science is fast.. say.. History used to be slow..
hope this helps :) Thanks for your help.
I did not find history invigorating before. It was not appealing to me because of the sense that events had happened so long ago, and because I enjoy the more concise, exact outcomes of science which history is famous for not having.
Hey there,
I like your response very much. I just have one suggestion. In the sentence above, I do not think you should include your liking of "consicise, exact outcomes of science". Mainly because it is contradicting to the rest of your response. I can clearly see why you have included it, but i think that the essay will be just as strong with out it. :D Instead of saying.. science is fast.. say.. History used to be slow..
hope this helps :) Thanks for your help.