Writing Feedback / Should people choose a simple life or rely on technology to solve environmental issues? [2]

Ever since the occurrence of Industrial revolution in the 18th century, technological advances have always been exerting innovations in leaps and bounds together with the emergence of hazardous environmental issues. To conquer such situation, there are opinions advocate a simpler lifestyle while others place great emphasis on technology itself to solve the on-going problem. In this essay, I shall be discussing both views and later give my opinion.

To begin with, as for the first perspective, people prefer to take on a simpler life as a means to veer away from the environmental impacts caused by the emergence in technological demands. Perhaps it is true to some extent that the arising environmental issues are usually taking root from excessive requirement of the mass for goods and technological development. To be more specific, it is no surprise that every single individual nowadays wants to possess a car or good electronic gadgets to keep pace with the fast-paced digital age; therefore, formidable demand for goods from the mass, which is surging every day, is likely to result in negative impacts on the environment. Furthermore, the society nowadays are developing into a disposable culture because of the constantly changing trend of following the competitive race of using convenient gadgets resulting in short-term using habits in any certain types of products and increasing environment-harmful disposals from such tendency. Hence, as long as people reduce the rapid rate of consuming goods, the environmental can be utterly tackled.

Nevertheless, effectively solving environmental problems also requires the involvement of technologies. Specifically, scientists currently are coming up with the idea of using solar or hydro power as alternatives for the hostile dwindling fossil fuels. Still, without the genuine desire of people to customize their ways of living, technological leaps created to deal with the environmental issues would become pointless in no time.

In conclusion, as far as I am concerned, people's changing conception to live a simpler life should be more advocated than only inactively depending on technologies to develop well enough to solve increasingly harmful environmental impacts. Hence, people should set limits on the usage of goods to protect the environment thoroughly.

Writing Feedback / Do you agree or disagree that advertising serves no purpose for the society and should be banned? [4]

The prevailing tendency of advertising through the social media has become ubiquitous for the majority of industries nowadays. Nevertheless, appealing as it may be, frowns of disapproval are given rejecting this kind of marketing stunt due to its misleading bombardment of information for the society. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the given statement.

Firstly, there is no denying the fact that advertising taps into the basic requirement of one business survival in terms of self-promoting its product or quality of service to the public. In fact, the majority of relevant consumers mostly acknowledge of any certain types of product through special offer or the intriguing marketing effects, all of which are intensively implemented on numerous advertisements. Secondly, advertisements have, inevitably, significant role in increasing opportunities for labor force. For instance, advertising sequences foster competitive environment for companies to suitably enhance their products. Hence, the general economy should also be influenced resulting in creation of new occupations for numerous individuals. Another special consideration in this cases is that the implicit strategies through advertising might pose as the promotion of convenience when using the product bringing positive feeling without offence. Generally, companies usually introduce their new versions by mentioning the comfortable lifestyle through using such products.

Despite its fundamental advantages in different ways, advertising still has some defects on the society. Misleading fact of the product may also be widely found. Particularly, some manufacturers can be a bit overboard when over reconsidering their goods as the most important or solely perfect tool while the initial quality of those are not compatible with such declaration. Still, the disadvantages of this trend cannot outweigh its social benefits.

In conclusion, undoubtedly, advertisements greatly reflect much of customers' desire for goods in an appropriate way while the society is still looking for its negative side rather than the positive. Thus, this kind of marketing should be seen more in optimistic light.