Writing Feedback / It is an absurd that a newspaper is the most crucial source of information [2]

Although more and more people read the news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of new for the majority of people.

Do you agree or disagree with that statement?

The internet or newspaper?

It's undeniable that Internet has become popular all over the world. Some people claim that the Internet can replace every kinds of transporting information to people while the remainder believe that traditional newspaper still hold the most necessary position among news reader. In my view, I'm completely in favor of the first idea due to the benefits it offers.

First and foremost, the internet is more attractive because of its easy access. Thanks to the appearance of internet on almost portable devices such as mobile phone, people can search for huge storage of news. Take the terrorization in November in 2015 happened in Paris for example. Just after a few minutes, it was updated on the internet and received a lot of sharing as well as contribution from global citizens. In contrast, with confusing procedures like editing and printing, everyone will know clearly about that news through the internet before the newspaper is public.

The second thing attracts people to read news online is that not only can they read but they also can be more interested in watching with real images. Rather than reading a long writing on newspaper or websites, people can listen to the announcer with a series of pictures illustrating for the news. Furthermore, newspaper can be easily lost but the internet will save eternally. For instance, a soccer fan can re-watch football matches anytime with only a tablet or a laptop connected the internet which we can never enjoy on newspaper.

In conclusion, it is rather absurd that newspaper is the most crucial source of information because it's nearly impossible for it to keep up with the speed of updating news on the internet.

Writing Feedback / Changing many jobs in our career can help us add more skills for our life [4]

Topic: Some people think that we should work in the same job for a life time. Others believe that we should change job at least once during our career. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Task:

A great idea is being written and said about the job. Some people believe that we should be faithful to one job for a life time. Others, however, still argue in changing job at least once during our career. I am completely convinced of the latter view because not only do we have more skills but we can also earn more money from new jobs

First and foremost, changing many jobs in our career can help us add more skills for our life. When an actor changes his job and becomes a director, not only does his skill get enhanced but he s also versatile and has a larger vision. Take Gary Oldman for instance. He has been a famous actor with the role in well-known film called "Batman". But now he is a talented director with successful film called "Mil by mouth" produced in 1997. Furthermore, spending too long time for a job also makes people feel monotonous. Everyone is all similar to each other. we all like new jobs and discover new things.

Additionally, you can have a higher source of revenue from new jobs. You find that mostly a restaurant manager can earn more money than a teacher. Take Li Lixin in China for example. He was a salesman in office stationery when he was 19. After 6 years, he marketed separately and nowadays, he is a billionaire by means of producing articles made of plastic. LI Lixin is one of the most richest person who changed job successfully.

In the conclusion, shifting jobs at least once in our career also brings people many benefits, You can both get more skills for yourself and increase your earnings from new jobs. Nevertheless, when you decide to change your job, you should consider carefully. It's also the key to your successful career now and in the future.