*I can see people commented on your intro. Well
you quote your father with an exclamation mark, but then say that he 'uttered'.
The time it took as I watched my dad disappear into the closet to get the belt felt like the longest thing I had ever waited on in my entire life.^It makes it sound as if this happened only one time, when in fact, your describing a 'ritual'.
well, one key thing about these essays is that although the prompt says "someone that influences you" they really dont care to know about the person and they still want to know about you.
i do not feel as if you have told enough about yourself. maybe, for example, if you can expand on the baseball thing. talk about how terrible you were and how your dad helped you. make sure you manage to focus on YOU.
i feel as if by the end of these essays, colleges want to find out something about you. i dont feel as if youve done that. uve just told us a lot about your dad only. DONT FALL FOR THE TRICK!
^Well this is disputable. I think the purpose of the essay is to tell readers about an influential person, in which the reader can understand how the writer responds and understands an influence. So, to focus on 'YOU', in my opinion, is not completely necessary as long as the readers can understand how the writer gets influenced and the writer's perception of what influence is.
The writer hasnt fallen for any trick in my opinion. I have understood that the writer has come to appreciate his father's sense of judgement and how teh father conducts himself. The writer does say how he has been influenced in his last parts of his essay.
Ok first things first. Your introduction...oh boy. Your dad whipped you with a belt when you were bad? Maybe you should choose a different way to express how unrelenting your dad is because child abuse isn't appealing to admissions unless your going to show how it shaped your life. But the lashing didn't shape your life, your dad did. Your just trying to use irony here.
^This is true. The father did shape his life. Hence the reason, that the father has made an impact on his life, which therefore directly addresses the essay prompt.
I did not quite see it as unrelenting, seeing as how the writer has already admitted that he only gets beaten because he himself knows he did something wrong. If one acknowledges fault, then is it wrong to punish? Also, I think this lashing can be appealing to Admissions because it is quite unusal for an applicant to be so openly honest in an essay. I doubt that the Admissions Commitee will think 'Lashing? This boy got lashed? I dont like this essay'.
Oh, dear. I'm very sorry that, in addition to beating you, your father brainwashed you into believing that the abuse was for your own good.
The writer does not give any background, so we as readers are left to assume.
I assume that this writer, did something dreadful to the point that even the writer knew he has wronged. (He admits that this only happens when he does something wrong.) The writer gives the impression that this happened on a basis, therefore giving off the impression that he has been a mischevious kid and that this he was in requirement of some discipline. I dont see how knocking some sense into this type of a kid is abuse. I think this is a fine topic to elaborate on, however I just dont think the writer gives enough to tell us how he has been influenced by his father.
That sort of punishment would widely be considered abuse today even if you had done something to deserve being punished by your parents. But you don't even give the reader that context, and so it seems as if it was a abusive ritual carried out regardless of your own behavior. The descriptions you give of the good things your father did don't have this level of detail, and so can't really balance out your opening narrative.
^True. The context here is quite important. We are all assuming things here. What exactly is a 'wrong action'?
and actually condone his actions. And this is really why the essay doesn't work. You shouldn't present yourself as someone who condones child abuse in a university application essay.
^Soz Simone, I said that you made an insensitive comment earlier. I cant find it in my post therefore cant delete it.
*I think your essay is fine however you dont give enough context, which leads to readers making assumptions. Readers can be led to believe that your father is some sadist, or that he is in fact hitting you for your own good. You need to clarify what your 'wrong actions' are so that we can understand your father's motives for hitting you. This is a controversial topic, however this may be controversy that catches the interest of the Admissions Committe I guess.
You talk about how your father has impacted your life, even though not that great in detail, but you dont really develop on why he is important to you. You should consider a stronger conclusion.
Alternatively, you can just post a new essay, because with a topic like lashing, reader's empathy, sensitivity, emotions, and subjective beliefs on lashing, will all influence their understanding of the essay and therefore may not work in your favor.
I think that even I may have strayed off a bit here lol.