The best age to learn a foreign language

the most suitable age to learn a foreign language

Education is one of the most important problems, which is by government,educationalits and parents. "How old is the best age to learn a foreign language?". Traditionally, the youngsters have begun learning language at secondary school. However, it is believed that learning a new language should be studied when children learn at primary school. This essay will support this argument by analyzing advantages as well as disadvantages of the best age to learn a new language.

On the one hand, there are some disadvantages when children studies at primary school. Firstly, childern need study other subjects that are more important at the age such as maths, mother tongue language. Therefore, learning new language is not only confusing and wastes time but also could put off development of child's first language. In addition, primary school teacher are generalists, which could cause difficulties in teaching as well as studying.

On the other hand, pupils who begin learning a foreign language at primary school gain several benefits. The first, the youngsters could learn faster because they are less self-conscious or shy as adolescents. They also pick up pronunciation; especially they enjoy copying and learning through games or images,which assist them learn a new language quite quickly. Moreover, nowadays languages are just as important as maths, because of the world communication. Knowing a foreign language , therefore, is one of most important advantages .

In conclusion, the best at age to learn foreign language is still a lot of different ideal, but in my opinion, children should begin learning a new language early, which help them expand future

Hi. I think you should pay attention to typos:
- "educationalits" to "educationalists", and the word "children" after "firstly, ...."
- You should pay attention to the article
- And 'firstly, children need to study "
@chingo

The actual prompt for this essay is based on the discussion that children tend to benefit more from learning a foreign language in primary school rather than secondary school. You are being asked to compare the advantages and disadvantages of this idea. You are not being asked to support one side of the discussion. An non-opinion based comparative discussion is required for this presentation. The problem, is that even though you presented the correct response to the discussion instructions, you added information to the essay restatement that was not part of the original discussion which is about the age best suited to learning a foreign language. You must never pose a rhetorical question in the prompt restatement because that totally changes the discussion topic. As such, your response is only partially correct and will receive a not so passing score in the TA section because of it.

There are referencing errors in your reasoning paragraphs. In the first reasoning paragraph, you indicated " there are some disadvantages when children studies at primary school." Studies what? Where is the subject of that sentence? What is the child going to study at a disadvantage. That is an improperly developed sentence. There is no logic to the presentation. The reference to language studies should be done twice in that sentence. Once as a topic sentence and another, as a transition sentence.

Do not present an opinion when the prompt is not asking you present one. You will get a reduced TA score for changing the discussion instructions twice in one essay. The conclusion should merely repeat the topic, and the reasons for advantages and disadvantages, nothing more.

Hello, I think that there's some misuse with your essays:
Firstly, childern need to study other subjects ....
The first, the youngsters could learn ....

Besides, I revised some of your sentences:
Knowing Having a good command of a foreign language , therefore, ...
children should begin ... early as early as possible, which help them expand future create more possibilities in the future.

Hope these comments helps!