TASK 2: What is the Best Method to Hire Employees?

Most employers interview candidates before hiring them. Do you think this is the best way to do it? In your opinion, what is the best method for choosing employees?

Interview is generally used by many companies to recruit employees. However, I believe that this is not the best way to hire people since it does not cover all the capability of applicants in which the assessment should be made to measure a whole ability of people such as aptitude test.

Conducting interview is not a very effective recruitment method because the interview does not give the interviewee a chance to show how good they really are. The skills tested in interview, such as the ability to communicate in a friendly manner and being able to answer the question without any assistance are the opposite of those required by many jobs. For example, a skilled computer programmer or lab technician may be socially awkward and used to consulting the internet before answering a question and they would never be able to show how technically proficient they are.

Needles to say, the best way to screen potential ability and analyze the bad or good point of applicants is by aptitude test. When it comes to hiring, aptitude test allow company to make a more informed decision by comparing the result of candidates in term of choosing the right person. For example, statistics reveal that 70% of world's recruitment companies use aptitude test as a part of their recruitment procedure in which permit the potential companies to determine how individuals complete particular job and how they fit well within the work environment.

In conclusion, interview does not cover all skills of people since it just shows communication ability instead of work's capability and the best method would be aptitude test. It is recommended to the companies combine both method to get a better result.

Sri, after reading your essay, what I like so much about it, is the simplicity and the convenience
of your choice of words. You managed to use words that are very easy to understand,
at the same time, you went straight to the point in answering the prompt.

The points you mentioned also serve a very good argument, I also believe that in an interview,
the goal is not to know the person from top to bottom or try to understand what s/he can do
but rather, lighting up that fire that will bring the best of the person's capabilities to do the job
presented.

Furthermore, your essay is short and was able to send the message you want your readers to read about.

I hope my insights was able to help in your essay and should you need further assistance we are here for you.

I am sorry, I put the wrong first body paragraph to this essay. Please look at the right paragraph:

As a method of recruitment, interview is not an appropriate way to assess people when they apply in a particular company, since interviewers is just showed the communication skills of candidates in spite of the fact that individuals have diverse abilities in which can e beneficial for the company. The proof of this can be seen psychologically, people can face difficulties to explain their ability to the inquirers though they can operate particular machine smoothly. It is thus clear that another test to evaluate applicants ability as a whole is needed.