Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment in essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Capital punishment is beneficial to penalize the recidivist. Some people say that it may increase our security in lives and control the violence in the society, while critics against it. I tend to agree that capital punishment may effective in side of law but not acceptable in the field of humanity.
Capital punishment is highly beneficial on criminal punishment. There is no exception to punish a holocaust actor and also humanization criminals as their dreadful crime causes a large number of deaths. For example, Saddam Husein, as a Libya leader who raises domestic war in his country got the capital punishment from the rebellions. The effect of such punishment can be prevented another criminals to do the similar crime. As the domino effect while a person see a terrible punishment occurred as result of something, it tend to stop the similar tendency.
However, in the side of humanistic view, human should be honour for their right. God giving people live and it is cruel while living is decided by the law. I believe that everybody is changing and also we should give a chance for people even they are criminals to make betterment in his life. It does not mean that I agree criminals should be live freely after some criminalization they do. Giving the second opportunity for people to change is wiser than that of capitalize them directly after crime. In any case of a robbery or terrorism attack, taking consideration as the curative measure is viewed more beneficial over doing capitalization.
Having said that capitalization is a good way to punish criminals in kinds of dreadful criminals also prevents another criminal's tendency. However, people may get a second opportunity even though the hazardous occurred as the effect of their behaviour. I agree that punishment should be stand strictly to control the violence in the society but not in shape of capitalization.
Capital punishment is beneficial to penalize the recidivist. Some people say that it may increase our security in lives and control the violence in the society, while critics against it. I tend to agree that capital punishment may effective in side of law but not acceptable in the field of humanity.
Capital punishment is highly beneficial on criminal punishment. There is no exception to punish a holocaust actor and also humanization criminals as their dreadful crime causes a large number of deaths. For example, Saddam Husein, as a Libya leader who raises domestic war in his country got the capital punishment from the rebellions. The effect of such punishment can be prevented another criminals to do the similar crime. As the domino effect while a person see a terrible punishment occurred as result of something, it tend to stop the similar tendency.
However, in the side of humanistic view, human should be honour for their right. God giving people live and it is cruel while living is decided by the law. I believe that everybody is changing and also we should give a chance for people even they are criminals to make betterment in his life. It does not mean that I agree criminals should be live freely after some criminalization they do. Giving the second opportunity for people to change is wiser than that of capitalize them directly after crime. In any case of a robbery or terrorism attack, taking consideration as the curative measure is viewed more beneficial over doing capitalization.
Having said that capitalization is a good way to punish criminals in kinds of dreadful criminals also prevents another criminal's tendency. However, people may get a second opportunity even though the hazardous occurred as the effect of their behaviour. I agree that punishment should be stand strictly to control the violence in the society but not in shape of capitalization.
Do You Need