Differences between human workers and robot workers

automated robots at work

With the continuous progress of science and technology, automated robots are being used to replace manpower in more posts. Irreplaceable advantages as robots do have, the question of whether robots can completely replace humans remains open to be debated. To begin with, robots are preciser and more logical than staff in present. Although they almost entirely depend on the employers' commands to execute, robots can only use the inherent program to run the tasks, unlike human staff who can adjust the order to avoid problems in advanced. In other words, robots cannot modify themselves when the codes goes wrong, but human workers can easily solve this question. Secondly, robots workers can remain efficient at any time, without slacking off and emotions. Human workers are different, but this shortcoming for people sometimes happens to be an advantage. A few perfect coincidences due to several minor emotional mistakes. For instance, penicillin was discovered by an accident. The final difference between human and robot is cost difference. Company ought to pay a range of costs for the staff, such as salary, transportation subsidies and insurance and housing fund. Robot workers only need to be supplied power and patched by mechanical parts, which can help the company save a large of money. Consequently, the discrepancy between human workers and robot workers are remarkably different.

Li, when indicating ownership of something such as employer's commands, an apostrophe S is used to indicate that a person or persons own the action or thing. The apostrophe after the S is used only when a contraction. You made these mistakes in your essay presentation. Remember the rules about the use of an apostrophe S and apply it next time. When you indicate an example in an essay, such as the story of the discovery of penicillin, tell the whole story. Since this refers to an accidental discovery, explain how it happened.Finally, the reference to the coding situation. Humans can easily adjust to the situation, they can resolve the situation, they do not solve the question because coding refers to a program that instructs a process, it is not a question.

What I can see in this essay is that you have a very good grasp of the English language and its vocabulary. Now, there are still imperfections in your sentence structures and word presentation but these do not hinder the understanding of what you are trying to impart to your reader. As an ESL, a native English speaker can make allowances for these simple mistakes but you should try to avoid repeating the same errors in the future if you want to improve your writing skills in English.

Thanks a lot
Your mean is that I need to use employer's instead of employers' , right?
btw, Can you point out the grammatical or syntactic errors in this article? I want to improve my writing skills.