Can someone please review my essay?.
Introduction:-
"Education is the one which nurtures the passion of the human" - Swami Vivekanada. Education should guide someone in the road of his passion to reach the destination of success. Let me clarify the rights of the educational institutes on students in the next paragraph.
Body:-
Our issue says students should be dissuaded from the institutions if management of the institute finds him to be unsuccessful. My doubt in this issue is how can an institute says a person is unsuccessful in his education. Only stalk holder who can judge his result of his education is student not the institutes. There may be many reasons for a student not to be unsuccessful in his education. Reason for his/her lagging has to be found and corrected by institutes. Institutes should not dissuade him abruptly without realizing the students concern. Decision to dropping the students from the institutes has to be given to the students. Students may have the zeal passion to excel in his studies, but he may find difficult in understanding the concepts explained by the professors or teachers. So in this case if an institute dissuade the student without realizing the reason for his failure it will ruin the life of the students. Eventually this type of activities by the institutes will lead to demotivate the students from achieving his/her passion. Many students who come from rural areas find it difficult to handle the urban culture in colleges located in the cities, obliquely this may result in the poor performance by the students. If institutes decide the poor performance students as unsuccessful because of his/her cultural barrier, this will lead to scotching the rural students from persuading his/her passion.
Conclusion:-
I hope above discussion would definitely yield that educational institutes does have zero rights to dissuade the students from pursing the fields of study.
Introduction:-
"Education is the one which nurtures the passion of the human" - Swami Vivekanada. Education should guide someone in the road of his passion to reach the destination of success. Let me clarify the rights of the educational institutes on students in the next paragraph.
Body:-
Our issue says students should be dissuaded from the institutions if management of the institute finds him to be unsuccessful. My doubt in this issue is how can an institute says a person is unsuccessful in his education. Only stalk holder who can judge his result of his education is student not the institutes. There may be many reasons for a student not to be unsuccessful in his education. Reason for his/her lagging has to be found and corrected by institutes. Institutes should not dissuade him abruptly without realizing the students concern. Decision to dropping the students from the institutes has to be given to the students. Students may have the zeal passion to excel in his studies, but he may find difficult in understanding the concepts explained by the professors or teachers. So in this case if an institute dissuade the student without realizing the reason for his failure it will ruin the life of the students. Eventually this type of activities by the institutes will lead to demotivate the students from achieving his/her passion. Many students who come from rural areas find it difficult to handle the urban culture in colleges located in the cities, obliquely this may result in the poor performance by the students. If institutes decide the poor performance students as unsuccessful because of his/her cultural barrier, this will lead to scotching the rural students from persuading his/her passion.
Conclusion:-
I hope above discussion would definitely yield that educational institutes does have zero rights to dissuade the students from pursing the fields of study.