Question:
The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words.
Answers:
A free trade system which cross the national boundary was being long-life controversy in myriad side of array of countries. People was divided into two major of thinking which have pro argument and contra about that system. My standpoint seeing this system as major half-truths in modern economic system, there are two kind of impact, the first one is looking advantages and the second one rise the drawbacks in the world's face.
In the trust with this system we could obtain many advantages. Firstly, we can increase our economic index rapidly and growing our market to more competitive than before. For example, our market and stock exchange could have bargaining position in another countries' eyes. Secondly, our country can export many things are endemic so readily. It could increase our domestic economy index. In the simple example that we could export an endemic fragrant woods namely Kayu Cendana so easily to Europe or other hemisphere in this world without the lot of bureaucracy.
On other side, myriad people think this system could be more dangerous than usual. They think that system has array of drawbacks. For the was happening is the lot of countries was relying on to another and it cannot rise their economic independently. Due to those countries too dependent with supplies from another. If these supplies will run out, those countries cannot do any things. In alternative way, if we argue to insert free trade system cross our sovereignty border we can tackle any problems with myriad problem solving. We could create a great deal of regulation in our parliament which still shield our sovereignty of nation.
Ultimately, free trade system is major half-truths of today's world economic system. This system made people divided into two side argue this argument, who pro and who contra with this agenda. in my opinion, this system is like a penny with two different side-advantages and disadvantage-depend on the way of view we could see it.
The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words.
Answers:
A free trade system which cross the national boundary was being long-life controversy in myriad side of array of countries. People was divided into two major of thinking which have pro argument and contra about that system. My standpoint seeing this system as major half-truths in modern economic system, there are two kind of impact, the first one is looking advantages and the second one rise the drawbacks in the world's face.
In the trust with this system we could obtain many advantages. Firstly, we can increase our economic index rapidly and growing our market to more competitive than before. For example, our market and stock exchange could have bargaining position in another countries' eyes. Secondly, our country can export many things are endemic so readily. It could increase our domestic economy index. In the simple example that we could export an endemic fragrant woods namely Kayu Cendana so easily to Europe or other hemisphere in this world without the lot of bureaucracy.
On other side, myriad people think this system could be more dangerous than usual. They think that system has array of drawbacks. For the was happening is the lot of countries was relying on to another and it cannot rise their economic independently. Due to those countries too dependent with supplies from another. If these supplies will run out, those countries cannot do any things. In alternative way, if we argue to insert free trade system cross our sovereignty border we can tackle any problems with myriad problem solving. We could create a great deal of regulation in our parliament which still shield our sovereignty of nation.
Ultimately, free trade system is major half-truths of today's world economic system. This system made people divided into two side argue this argument, who pro and who contra with this agenda. in my opinion, this system is like a penny with two different side-advantages and disadvantage-depend on the way of view we could see it.
