The table shows the regular distance of people traveling that measured based on miles of travelled between 1985 and 2000. Overall, it is noticeble, that inhabitant prefered to choose a car rather than walked for hanging out in both different years.
By 1985, the figure had shown accuratelly, that the proportion of inhaitand walked traveling account for 255 miles during a year. By contrast with car usage, the average travelled up to 3.1995 miles, the car usage tenfold from walked distance accumulation. In 2000, the average distance of travelled by car was increase dramatically up to 4.806 miles while the number of people travelled on foot decreased slightly to 237 miles. we can see that the inhabitant were more likely to travel by car over the ten years.
By 1985, the figure had shown accuratelly, that the proportion of inhaitand walked traveling account for 255 miles during a year. By contrast with car usage, the average travelled up to 3.1995 miles, the car usage tenfold from walked distance accumulation. In 2000, the average distance of travelled by car was increase dramatically up to 4.806 miles while the number of people travelled on foot decreased slightly to 237 miles. we can see that the inhabitant were more likely to travel by car over the ten years.
