Is it the right time for wildlife preservation? task2

In light of the current socio-economic situation of the world, do you think this the right time for wildlife preservation? If yes, what are the ways and means you suggest for this?" Give your opinion in no less than 250 words.

the preservation of nature issue

Wildlife preservation is debatable issue in present world. While social-economic condition has been demanding more natural resources to address increased population needs, healthy eco-system is also needed for continued existence of them. I assert that wildlife preservation is an alarming issue for human survival, and there are various potential ways to preserve this.

Protecting wild plant and animal species and their habitats is indispensable for every aspect of human life. If the excessive use of the resources is going on as to socio-economic demand, the nature then will be disruptive for future generation. For instance, various electrical power plants are already situated in wild places by removing numerous forest and hills, and the effects of such removal is contributing to the global warming. For this reason, the preservation of wild life is a crucial subject in order to save our nature in the present time.

Nevertheless, when the protection of wildlife is concerned, there are potential solutions to be offered to resolve this. Despite of environmental awareness, no steps can work effectively, so raising awareness among people will be effective one of possible solution. And then policy maker can implement restrictions against the use of natural resources. Finally, instead of using fossil fuels, alternatives such as Plant-derived plastics, biodiesel, wind power and solar power can be introduced to reserve those fuels from running out soon. Thus, it is not impossible to preserve wild life in a right manner.

To conclude, whereas the condition of socio-economy is noteworthy for most of people, the preservation of nature is also unavoidable. Considering these view, I m realizing that wildlife should be protected. Some steps like awareness, imposing strong law, renewable energy is magnificent option to address the concerning issue.

Sfiza,

I understand your point of view, only the part " For instance, various electrical power plants" isn't clear for me maybe if you put the same example, it will be clearer.

I hope I could help you a little bit.

Fiza, you did not understand the prompt. When a discussion about socioeconomics is called into play, you are asked to consider the expense of having to preserve nature against the amount of money that it takes to develop the society that we live in. For example, if a country spends 50 million on building roadways, hospitals, schools, and other social necessities for humans, one can say that the country is spending the money properly on socioeconomics. However, there is still a need to preserve nature in the sense that it brings a balance to the life of man on the planet. However, in order to protect the forests and endangered species of animals, the government would have to spend 100 million on nature and wildlife preservation. Do you think that is an equal amount of spending on the social and natural demands of living? The socioeconomic aspect of the discussion should be looked at and reviewed along those lines. The expense of one when compared to the cost of the other. Since world economics proves to be quite difficult to maintain these days, is it still proper to spend additionally on wildlife preservation? That is the discussion that you have to present. It is about dollars and cents. Not about ways and means of preserving animal habitats.

Dear@Holt
@Holt thanks a lots.