Requisite: UvA as a part of the application procedure wants candidates to supply a motivation letter along with all other documents. What makes it interesting is that, UvA wants the motivation letter to be a max of 300 words.
Actual text from UvA website (uva.nl/en/education/master-s/master-s-programmes/masters-programmes/masters-programmes/content/folder/information-studies-business-information-systems/application-and-admission/submit-your-application/application-procedure-bis.html):
Motivation letter (max. 300 words): why you want to enrol in this programme, what topics related to the programme you are interested in, which personal strengths make you suitable for it.
I understand that all the question will have to transitions but at the same they should all be interconnected. I am unsure if the below letter lives up to the expectation of the Uni. and hence, appreciate if somebody can weigh it. Lastly, I plan to add a brief foot note to supply more information on the kind of data and software packages that I have worked on, in addition to awards that I have won.
Appreciate any suggestion that can improve this letter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional experience helped me unstructured data coupled with analytical thinking can help develop information that can aid organizations do whatever they do, but better. This influenced and contributed to growing interest that finally articulated my personal mission as it offered a very unique steaming challenge as they dare to be. Enrolling in the programme propositions me an opportunity to comprehend business, introduces to new theories, broadens knowledge on - when to ask questions, how and where to research and how to develop and manage solutions that are in line with organizational goals. Further course also helps to connect the dots - how a business operates and what drives decisions. This course will present unique opportunity to exercise strategy and get exposure to new type of thinking.
Jobs now require understanding of the relevant laws, techniques and procedures. To aid organizational and societal decision-making, strong foundation for business and insights into how business functions are absolutely necessary. One should be able to develop and research design to approach the problem.
As a fraud investigator, I am capable of working through the chaotic swirl of complexities that requires effectively handle. I listen, question and driving to the root causes. I have always backed up my hypothesis with concrete findings that has formed a part of the investigative report. In the first every expense abuse investigation, I recovered $ 27k. On a similar note, in a high priority anonymous corruption allegation case that I managed, I found evidence with the minimal information from a whistle-blower. I have experience working on various forms of data and working with people from culturally diverse backgrounds. I have won various awards that demonstrate the good work that I have done and also evidences the fact that I have thought creatively and applied logic in trying to make sense of something when information sparse.
Actual text from UvA website (uva.nl/en/education/master-s/master-s-programmes/masters-programmes/masters-programmes/content/folder/information-studies-business-information-systems/application-and-admission/submit-your-application/application-procedure-bis.html):
Motivation letter (max. 300 words): why you want to enrol in this programme, what topics related to the programme you are interested in, which personal strengths make you suitable for it.
I understand that all the question will have to transitions but at the same they should all be interconnected. I am unsure if the below letter lives up to the expectation of the Uni. and hence, appreciate if somebody can weigh it. Lastly, I plan to add a brief foot note to supply more information on the kind of data and software packages that I have worked on, in addition to awards that I have won.
Appreciate any suggestion that can improve this letter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the chaotic swirl of complexities
Professional experience helped me unstructured data coupled with analytical thinking can help develop information that can aid organizations do whatever they do, but better. This influenced and contributed to growing interest that finally articulated my personal mission as it offered a very unique steaming challenge as they dare to be. Enrolling in the programme propositions me an opportunity to comprehend business, introduces to new theories, broadens knowledge on - when to ask questions, how and where to research and how to develop and manage solutions that are in line with organizational goals. Further course also helps to connect the dots - how a business operates and what drives decisions. This course will present unique opportunity to exercise strategy and get exposure to new type of thinking.
Jobs now require understanding of the relevant laws, techniques and procedures. To aid organizational and societal decision-making, strong foundation for business and insights into how business functions are absolutely necessary. One should be able to develop and research design to approach the problem.
As a fraud investigator, I am capable of working through the chaotic swirl of complexities that requires effectively handle. I listen, question and driving to the root causes. I have always backed up my hypothesis with concrete findings that has formed a part of the investigative report. In the first every expense abuse investigation, I recovered $ 27k. On a similar note, in a high priority anonymous corruption allegation case that I managed, I found evidence with the minimal information from a whistle-blower. I have experience working on various forms of data and working with people from culturally diverse backgrounds. I have won various awards that demonstrate the good work that I have done and also evidences the fact that I have thought creatively and applied logic in trying to make sense of something when information sparse.