Writing Feedback / IELTS WRITTING TASK 2 Question: some people argue that university students should be free to choose [2]

Question: some people argue that university students should be free to choose their subjects. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study courses of future benefits like science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In today's advanced education, the topic of freedom to choose subjects at university has sparked a fiery discussion among people across the globe. While some argue that students in universities should have the right to decide their subjects, others believe that it is better for them to only study subjects that will benefit their future careers, such as science or technology. In a broader sense, this essay contends that the advantages of voluntary decisions surpass the value of studying only academic subjects, especially in the long term.

On the one hand, those who consider students should have the liberty to make decisions on their subjects are likely to argue that students are more inspired to study if they have their own choices. Indeed, each pupil's own differing interests influence their application to the university's subjects. For instance, individuals with linguistic and literary ability tend to prefer to delve into history, geography, or social science rather than spend hours and hours in math or technology classes. Therefore, the freedom to choose subjects not only fuels students' motivation but also promotes their distinct talents. The creativity and strong points like negotiation or critical thinking equipped to students via the studying process lend assistance in their future occupation while at the same time promoting personal development.

On the other hand, other groups that value academic subjects have their merits, particularly in the way students are taught essential skills for their future careers. Various job opportunities are given to students while they have a profound understanding of the field, including mathematics, science, or technology. To be specific, those who take these courses are able to access a wide range of well-paying and in-demand jobs because the rapid expansion of these industries results in a high demand for skilled professionals with profound expertise. Additionally, the outcomes of advances in science, technology, medicine, or engineering benefit society as a whole. However, it is hard to keep students' enthusiasm for compulsory education for a long time.

In conclusion, granting students the autonomy to apply preferred subjects' advantages outweighs the positive potential of mandatory subjects. Learning and pursuing careers relevant to interests and talents help to maintain students' passions in adulthood. In my opinion, while it seems reasonable to make student study subjects serve in the future workplace, it is more important to allow them to choose what they want to study for the creativity and innovation that liberty brings about.

Writing Feedback / IELTS WRITTING TASK 2 : With the rise of the ebooks comes the decline in paper books [2]

With the rise of the ebooks comes the decline in paper books. Some people see it a good step forward while others do not. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

With today's advanced technology, digital reading has gradually become common among book's lovers. The increase of e-books, entailing an upward trend in the physical one, is considered to be a positive step forward by a group of individuals, while others hold a contrast view. From my perspective, this alternative of traditional books still has some disadvantages, though they are outweighed by the obvious benefits.

Supporters of conventional reading are likely to invoke the adverse effects of e-books on human well-being. To be specific, spending time constantly on a green screen to read definitely weakens our eyesight. Therefore, reading electronic books hours to hours contributes to causing chronic eyes' problem in the long run. Secondly, using smart books on electronic devices can be an uncomfortable experience because of the sudden appearance of pop-up notifications, interrupting the reader's concentration. For that reason, digital books seem to be bothering and perhaps irritating readers. However, all of these issues have efficient remedies, such as separating reading period into shorter times or activating focus mode on smart equipment.

Continuing, I posit that the straightforward advantages ebooks bring about have potential to outcome its negative impacts. Primarily, the conveniences offered by virtual reading are emphasized. With a pocket portable device, readers are able to access the information, regardless of space and time. This completely settles the matter of storage space of conventional books, at the same time being suitable for traveling especially. Otherwise, online reading has the ability to save the reader's budget thanks to a variety of unpaid reading websites and digital libraries, easily found on the Internet. Finally, electronic books are also involved in preserving the environment by easing cutting down trees, the main material for generating paper. Decrease in physical books entails the reduction in its component - paper, particularly.

To conclude, while several drawbacks still exist in on-screen reading, they definitely can be addressed, therefore outweighed by the benefits profiting readers. Indeed, the emergence of electronic books can be seen as a further step forward optimistically.