Writing Feedback / I strongly believe that life in a big city is extremely enjoyable [7]

Some people choose to live in big cities. However others argue that it is better to live in small cities or in the countryside.

From my point of view, it is much more convenient to live in a big city. First of all, there are very many facilities in a big city as shopping centers, restaurants, parks, theaters, cinemas and so on. Living in a big city, you do not have any problems with choosing a place where you can have a good time no matter what you would like to do. What is more, the level of education in big cities is higher than in smaller ones. Indeed, there are many excellent schools, institutes and universities in big cities. There are a lot of different study societies as well.

On the other hand, people say that it is cheaper to live in a small city or in the countryside. Moreover, they think that small city life is calm and peaceful. And thanks to a small territory it does not take much time to get somewhere.

Nevertheless, I cannot share this point of view. Firstly it is easier to find a decent, well-paid job in a big city. As it has a large population, there is a plenty of vacations. One can find anything he likes and earn enough. Secondly, big city life is more interesting because you can take part in various events. A lot of concerts and competitions are held there. Finally, transport system is more developed in big cities. The most convenient mean of transport is the underground. Even wealthy people who have cars use it.

All things considered, I strongly believe that life in a big city is extremely enjoyable and everyone should try it!

Writing Feedback / Advantages of face-to-face communication [4]

Topic: Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.

Some people claim that living conversation is the best way to communicate to people. However others believe that it's much better to converse through the internet or by phone.

Personally, I think that there's no equivalent to face-to-face interaction. First of all, talking to a person in the reality you are able to perceive non-verbal information. Indeed, it's well known that we get to know people much better by watching their body language. Secondly, it can be very dangerous to get acquainted online. There are many people who use the internet in order to find naive people and make use of them. Of course some of these people can do without internet but it's more likely to meet them on social networks than in the reality.

On the other hand, there are people who consider such kind of communication as letters and emails very romantic. Moreover, they say that the internet is very useful for those people who are too shy to talk to people in the real life.

I'm afraid this is not the way I think. In the first place, I think nobody should believe in that what is written in letters because it's much easier to lie in writing form. Furthermore, I'm sure that shy people communicating to others on the internet become even shyer. It seems to me that modest people who really want to change themselves should be more outgoing, meet different people, have personal talks with them.

To conclude, it seems to me that nothing can replace a living conversation because it has much more advantages than any other kinds of communication. And I strongly believe that people should pay more attention to person-to-person interaction.