Writing Feedback / IELTS TASK 1 The table illustrates the number of technological researchers in the five countries [3]

Pellet working as researchers in technology

The table illustrates the number of technological researchers in the five countries from 2003 to 2007. The measure unit was per million people
In general, Poland had the highest number of people working in this field while Togo had the lowest. Moreover, Apart from Poland with a decrease, Turkey with a rise, the other three countries all experienced a fluctuation.

Out of the five countries, Poland had the largest number of people working as tech researchers, with 285. Except in 2005, the number in Poland was higher than any countries, in any year. Nevertheless, it was the only countries that underwent a downturn.

Mexico, in 2003, was in the second place with 147. It overtook Poland in 2005 and peaked at 234 in the same year. However, this number decreased slightly in the following year and rose again to 183 in 183 in 2007.

Starting with 103 in 2003, Moldova fluctuated dramatically. After a significant drop to 89 in 2005, it increased to 114 in 2007. Togo had the same fluctuation. With 18 in 2003, the country reached its peak in 2003. Over a three year period, it dropped to 18, the same number as 2003. Turkey was the only country that had an upswing. Just nearly 50 in 2003, it rose by more than 55% to 106 in the next four year.

• 
  Screenshot2.png
  

Writing Feedback / An inborn talent can define kids performance in a particular field. Is it true? [2]

practice and training versus talent

It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sports or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is a controversial argument that whether inborn talent of children can decide their performance in a particular field or their ability can be acquired from training. My essay will clarify the two opinions and state my point of view

On the one hand, people with natural aptitudes are believed to perform in a specific field better than others. People who are born with talents such as drawing or writing can learn skills in these fields effectively with less effort. It is not difficult to see that many outstanding artists or scientists showed their talents since their childhood. And the inborn ability of a person is something that cannot be taught or learned in any school.

On the other hand, people having no special talents can also make achievement. It is said that practice makes perfect, children can learn how to play sports or play musical instruments in their schools, and if they practice what they learn regularly, they can gain more experience than other children, which makes their performance more professional. However, if those with natural ability do not spend time practicing and training, their talents cannot develop fully.

In my opinion, a performance of a person is a combination of talents and practice. Because without those without aptitudes can hardly be as excellent as those who own one, moreover, their practice cannot be as productive as others. However, I also believe that without special training, talented children cannot learn how to reach the highest level of their potential

In conclusion, practice and training does make a great contribution to the perfomances of children. Nevertheless, if a child wants to be excel in a particular field, inborn talents are of greater significance.