Writing Feedback / 'censorhip'; Creative artists should have freedom to express their views [3]

Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is well known that during the last decades artists have been treated more like a voice of the population, due to their ability to express ideas and opinions using a lot of expression trying not to insult to system directly, by using subliminal messages, being indispensible to human's soul and life. This fact was possible until censorship was settled and their freedom was restricted.

To my mind being an artist means a huge amount of creativity, freedom and last but not least motivation. It can be widely acknowledged that 30 years ago, in the Eastern Europe, when the communists where leading the countries, artists used to develop their creations, even if we are talking about poems, movies or songs, by making a directly link to the political views. In this case censorhip was more like an obstacle in the front the artists and if they really wanted to express their personal views and ideas they had to risk their freedom.

On balance, things had an impressive turning nowadays. The governments haved disabled most of these restrictions giving artists the possibility of expressing their ideas without complaining about the strictness of censorhip. However, sometimes they lose their control and do unsuitable things such as wearing sexy clothes, singing worthless songs, drawing pornographies, etc. It conflicts with their culture and moral standards. Therefore, government should have some restrictions to limit these cases, as well as to preserve traditional value and nation image.

While it is important to acknowledge the value of the both sides I personally tend to believe that things had changed a lot on this side, and the government restrictions are not as severe as it use to be in the past.

Writing Feedback / Earning capacity of successful SPORTS professionals Vs OTHER professionals [3]

Successfully sports professionals cand eanr a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinon.

During the ages, sports professionals were treated more like heroes thanks to their ability to perfom a larger amount of physical effort. It it generally know that an athlete earns more money than a normal person. In the past this payment was justified because athletes used to play all with one's heart, but nowadays things are quite different, because the passion for game is lost, and the only target of the athletes is to earn more and more.

On one hand, I am convinced that there are still some athletes who play and train with passion, trying to develop a gratefully career based on motivation and tough exercise, placing the financial issues in the background. Well I strongly believe that these kind of persons deserve all the admiration and appreciation.

On the other hand, I am inclined to believe that there is another category of sports professionals, who are motivated only by money and material benefits. In this case there is no passion, no connection between the athlete and the audience, and the money that are paid are unjustified. For example a football player, which is kept on the bench as a sub does not deserve his money, because he prefer to pretend himself injuriend, being exempted from doing effort.

Taking everything into consideration I tend to belive that being an athlete is more like an honor, and this thing should be treated with more responsibility and gratitude.