Writing Feedback / IELTS:Good members of society - Who's Responsible? [4]

Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Please check for me. I always appreciate for you enthusiasm.

People have many different views about the role of school and parents in building a good manner for the young generation. For many, it is considered that this duty totally belongs to people who gave birth to them, meanwhile, others argue for the responsibility of educated organisations.

First of all, school is the first place where children obtain formal education, including knowledge about nature as well as culture and researching skills. Pupils are taught how to learn the alphabet in phonetic sound form and write simple sentences right in the primary school. More importantly, what I absolutely want to emphasize is that children stand many chances of not only approaching exact theories about surroundings but also broading their mind in the school. In addition to studying, the expanse of teaching non-accademic subjects such as sports, dance, painting also has a remarkable contribution in the physical and mental development of the young. Music and drawing competitions in all types of schools would be striking examples worth mentioning.

On the other hand, parents are the prior teacher for their sons and daughters. They keep in touch with their offspring everyday so that children's behaviours are virtually controlled to be right for moral standards in society, from learning how to greet someone to establish habits of daily life. As can be seen from the modern life, a considerable number of children fell into social evils as a consequence of the lack of parents' nurture.

In the final analysis, I strongly stress that it is extremely essential to balance the role of parents and school in teaching children the way of becoming a good citizen in society.

Writing Feedback / Whether the power of advertisement or the real need of people? [7]

Nowadays, advertising activities are regarded as a crucial marketing strategy in order to create a huge profit in the majority of companies. Thus, there remains some debates that this enormous financial resource merely shows the strong dominance of advertising and not customers' actual demands. I personally agree with this idea, however, what I want to emphasize that something should be advertised in this way to suit modern life. Some reasons are as follows.

First of all, it is undeniable that advertisement links between buyers and products through images, logos as long with slogans attached in packaging simultaneously. In addition to the information of ingredients as well as origin of goods, they are of important tools to attract customers. For my experience, it is believed that spending a considerable amount of money on buying a weight lose product is considered as a silly behaviour, however, there has been a number of people willing to buy it. The suspicion is disappeared by the promise of a beautiful body which sellers establish in customers' mind by advertising.

Further and even more importantly, consumer behaviour is frequently dominated by current fashion trends, not comes from the real needs of daily life. Admittedly, human being is susceptible to surrouned environment, not apart from the way of using money at the present time. As a simple example, most of people were ready to cost approximately $690 to owe an Iphone 5S of Apple although their purpose was only to compare with old mobile phone how the difference were. Moreover, even for many, not having a smart phone was a shame.

Notwithstanding, advertisement also has some remarkable effects on helping people approach to latest and best products as quickly as possible.
By way of conclusion, it is essential to balance what people really need and what the messages of advertisement reflect.