madisongreen
Aug 30, 2013
Essays / Retreat; The city had finally fallen to the invaders! [9]
I like the concept of the story and I don't think anyone's writing is truly bad, rather they just haven't harnessed their writing capabilities yet. To me it's like saying there is such a thing as a stupid question.
"to express the corruption fighting can cause and how it can spread easily and the devastation it causes"--this is your exigence. with this in mind one could evaluate the story better.
there are some unanswered questions and background info that I think would add to the plot of your story.
-what did the bad guy do that makes him the bad guy other than killing dad?
-what is the proof that the invaders are the corrupt side? for all I know it might be the narrators side (that would be an interesting story, one from the "enemy's" point of view)
-why is the king considered a stupid pig, he never did anything that I saw to deserve that
-I'm a little confused about how the situation turned from the chaos of dying bodies everywhere to complete silence
-I cant quite picture the setting completely. at first I see them invading a castle but when you describe dad and rallying together and breaking the ranks to attack, I see more of a open field. Maybe be more
specific about where everything is happening within the city.
-When describing a battle scene it is important to be as exact as possible. when they're fighting and you say something about using a trick taught by dad, I have no idea what that trick is.
-I don't know where the archer or mother came from.
-I don't know who the narrator is. The only reason I say this is because I find myself asking Why him?
-why are they fighting?
-What happens next? there is so much left that is unknown.
-I think you should name the city. Makes it sound more personal to the narrator and to the reader.
Most of my input involves some more backstory, which may would help in getting the right emotion for the climax (the battle). I just cant get my mindset into war in the beginning without having a reason to.
Try to think of a theme or two or three that you really want to get across. I honestly didn't see corruption or devastation in the story. I saw courage and bravery, or sacrifice. It isn't over a long enough period of time to really evoke devastation and it lacks a backstory to explain corruption.
I think that you could really go somewhere with this, and I like a lot of your descriptions. You could go for an epic hero sort of thing with a tragic ending. or maybe you could go with something totally different from the enemies perspective (I just really like that idea and I might write about it myself).
When writing it just picture the whole thing as a movie in your head. think about what would make sense to happen and the reasons behind those happenings. also really paint pictures in your head of the people, atmosphere, emotions. and describe everything as accurately as possible from the narrator's perspective.
Just some food for thought.
I like the concept of the story and I don't think anyone's writing is truly bad, rather they just haven't harnessed their writing capabilities yet. To me it's like saying there is such a thing as a stupid question.
"to express the corruption fighting can cause and how it can spread easily and the devastation it causes"--this is your exigence. with this in mind one could evaluate the story better.
there are some unanswered questions and background info that I think would add to the plot of your story.
-what did the bad guy do that makes him the bad guy other than killing dad?
-what is the proof that the invaders are the corrupt side? for all I know it might be the narrators side (that would be an interesting story, one from the "enemy's" point of view)
-why is the king considered a stupid pig, he never did anything that I saw to deserve that
-I'm a little confused about how the situation turned from the chaos of dying bodies everywhere to complete silence
-I cant quite picture the setting completely. at first I see them invading a castle but when you describe dad and rallying together and breaking the ranks to attack, I see more of a open field. Maybe be more
specific about where everything is happening within the city.
-When describing a battle scene it is important to be as exact as possible. when they're fighting and you say something about using a trick taught by dad, I have no idea what that trick is.
-I don't know where the archer or mother came from.
-I don't know who the narrator is. The only reason I say this is because I find myself asking Why him?
-why are they fighting?
-What happens next? there is so much left that is unknown.
-I think you should name the city. Makes it sound more personal to the narrator and to the reader.
Most of my input involves some more backstory, which may would help in getting the right emotion for the climax (the battle). I just cant get my mindset into war in the beginning without having a reason to.
Try to think of a theme or two or three that you really want to get across. I honestly didn't see corruption or devastation in the story. I saw courage and bravery, or sacrifice. It isn't over a long enough period of time to really evoke devastation and it lacks a backstory to explain corruption.
I think that you could really go somewhere with this, and I like a lot of your descriptions. You could go for an epic hero sort of thing with a tragic ending. or maybe you could go with something totally different from the enemies perspective (I just really like that idea and I might write about it myself).
When writing it just picture the whole thing as a movie in your head. think about what would make sense to happen and the reasons behind those happenings. also really paint pictures in your head of the people, atmosphere, emotions. and describe everything as accurately as possible from the narrator's perspective.
Just some food for thought.