Writing Feedback / With all the troubles in the world today, money spent on space exploration is a waste! [3]

With all the troubles in the world today, money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other things.

To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Every day on the Earth 1000 children die from malnutrition and hunger, over 2000 people die from cancer and AIDS. Every year environmentalists urge global society to take some urgent measures to stop global warming, to preserve the endangered spices. Such considerations have led some to question the ethics of investing huge sums of money on space exploration. As far as I concerned, the price that we pay for space exploration is unreasonably high and those money could be used better.

Public become aware about AIDS as a fatal disease just in the 1980s and 2000s it already becomes an epidemic, which quickly spreads all over the world, affecting young population. There are still no drugs to eradicate the virus, no vaccine to protect risk groups and to safe lives of millions. Moreover the maintenance treatment for each person could reach as far as 20000 dollars per month, which is barely affordable by every sick person. So, state financial support is the last resort for those who are already sick; likewise it is the hope for society that modern science would find remedy to take control over AIDS.

Another global problem is poverty. Most of the population of the developing countries struggle for food, source of clean water, access for medical care. It will entail enormous international finance to facilitate and sustain development of economy, health sector and education. Therefore, this major problem couldn't be neglected for the sake of space exploration.

No one would argue against the fact that space research could open the door in a new era of human existence, provide the scientists with interesting findings. However I inclined to think that money must be spend to curb poverty, to find treatment for AIDS rather than to conduct highly scientific research.

Writing Feedback / The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education. [2]

These three bar charts compare the changes in a proportion of girls participating in an education process for developed and developing countries. The number of girls, at all levels of education experienced a gradual growth for both types of countries.

For countries with an unstable economy the number of girl attaining a primary education went up from 83 in 1990 to 87 in 2000. The same increase occurred for the data for secondary education and high school, where the figures moved upwards from 66 to 75 in 1990 and 2000 respectively.

The data for girls' pupils attended various level of school in developed world improved too. However the trend for developed world is that - the higher level of education the bigger proportion of girl participated in educational process. There were 93 girls in primary school in 1990, while 98 girls in secondary school and moreover 105 girls in high school. The quantity of girls received a high education in the developed world outnumbered the quantity boys. Therefore the number of girls attended a primary school was bigger and totaled 87 in 2000 than the number of girl in high school with 75 for the developing countries.

Writing Feedback / The salary of top management stuff and menial workers in big companies differ [3]

The salary of top management stuff and menial workers in big companies differ significantly. This difference allows motivate ordinary workers for further development. Moreover, high salary appeals gifted managers and prevents them to be reemployed by rival companies. So to my mind it solution is absolutely justified.

First of all, the talented manager is a major asset for any company, as he determines a success and prosperity. For example efficient management's decision on proper time for advert or modernization or launching new project will lead company to complete success or total failure in fierce global market competition. These decisions are utmost important because of their scale, as they applied the big company. Furthermore, as a major factor for success, top manager stuff could be reemployed by business rival. Therefore labor market is overcrowded; the gifted managers which could understand and manage people in business setting are always at scarce. Hence, high salary is a powerful mean to retain the talent.

Fairly high salary serves as proper motivation for further development. For example, menial workers who didn't get a necessary knowledge or skills for various reasons as a poverty or unwillingness will eager to learn in pursue for promoted position. Consequently, it could turn out that not all of them will meet the condition, though some talents would be discovered.

The leaders of big companies are getting salary that in many times more than salary of ordinary workers. I think this reasonable as it is the main engine for further personal development of prospective candidates and insurance for the company of the long and prosperous collaboration.

Writing Feedback / Unpaid social service revive patriotism and responsibilities among students [2]

The graduates of a high school are bound to occupy superior positions in a society. Hence, they will be responsible for further development and prosperity and it's vitally important for them to take a brass of things, to learn to cater the man in the street. Community unpaid service- like charity work, teaching unprivileged children - could inspire them to find unexpected solution and remain conscious citizen.

First of all, in order to foster a competitive specialist a high school employs a wide range of teaching methods like seminars, conferences, lectures and many others. The mandatory community service could supply students with the reliable information how thing goes in realty. For example, it would be invaluable experience for future politician or economist to work for charity or teach children It will help them to perceive the urgency of people needs and it may point out a possible solution.

Secondly, a charity work allows graduates to remain human, to be modest and considerable citizen. The best example is the Royal Family. Their participation in the numerous charity events couldn't give absolutely plausible insight in normal people's life. Nevertheless it expresses their attitudes towards citizen and sometimes could spotlight their needs.

Nobody would argue against the fact that community unpaid service detracts valuable time from a high school's curriculum. It would be more practical to get some low qualified job but in your field. Therefore unpaid social service revive their patriotism, their responsibilities, moreover it it enrich them with new ideas and out-of-the-box solutions.