Kisakina
Dec 31, 2015
Undergraduate / Columbia Engineering Essay: Jazz band was the last class I expected to use mathematics... [7]
Thank you vangiespen for noticing that...whoa, that could've hurt me big time.
Jazz band was the last class I expected to use mathematics.
So, when I saw numbers on the music theory worksheet-a list of pentatonic scales in numbered musical notations-I was surprised. I only understood music as an art, to be mastered with practice and intuition; it never occurred to me to approach music from an analytical perspective.
I tried to make sense of the seemingly random sequences of numbers and symbols, but with little success. Being both a curious mathematician and an uncompromising musician, I was determined to decipher the numerical code to uncover what secrets to music it may behold.
I soon realized that the numbers were used to restore order to the chaotic universe of jazz. Every musical element had a numerical counterpart; chords can be described with ratios, musical scales can be expressed with permutations, and melodies can be identified with set theory. As I made more connections between mathematics and music, I started to notice that I heard music differently; I recognized that the upright bass walked in algorithmic patterns and that the tenor saxophone responded by playing harmonic melodies. I was thrilled by the epiphany; I was learning a completely different way to understand music.
All of a sudden, new possibilities began to emerge. If music can be modeled mathematically, can computers recognize good music, conduct an orchestra, or compose a masterpiece? I then discovered that these fascinating questions can be answered in the world of musical analysis and engineering through technology such as algorithmic composition and musical interactivity. I want to explore these realms and advance them, finding new ways to connect music with numbers, figures, equations, and computations.
Would this be better? I feel like the conclusion seems kind of "tacked on"...
Thank you vangiespen for noticing that...whoa, that could've hurt me big time.
Jazz band was the last class I expected to use mathematics.
So, when I saw numbers on the music theory worksheet-a list of pentatonic scales in numbered musical notations-I was surprised. I only understood music as an art, to be mastered with practice and intuition; it never occurred to me to approach music from an analytical perspective.
I tried to make sense of the seemingly random sequences of numbers and symbols, but with little success. Being both a curious mathematician and an uncompromising musician, I was determined to decipher the numerical code to uncover what secrets to music it may behold.
I soon realized that the numbers were used to restore order to the chaotic universe of jazz. Every musical element had a numerical counterpart; chords can be described with ratios, musical scales can be expressed with permutations, and melodies can be identified with set theory. As I made more connections between mathematics and music, I started to notice that I heard music differently; I recognized that the upright bass walked in algorithmic patterns and that the tenor saxophone responded by playing harmonic melodies. I was thrilled by the epiphany; I was learning a completely different way to understand music.
All of a sudden, new possibilities began to emerge. If music can be modeled mathematically, can computers recognize good music, conduct an orchestra, or compose a masterpiece? I then discovered that these fascinating questions can be answered in the world of musical analysis and engineering through technology such as algorithmic composition and musical interactivity. I want to explore these realms and advance them, finding new ways to connect music with numbers, figures, equations, and computations.
Would this be better? I feel like the conclusion seems kind of "tacked on"...