Writing Feedback / Staying in one place or living in several different place is a choice. IELTS Task 2 [2]

In the past, people usually stayed in one place throughout their life. These days, people often move around. They often live in several different places in their lifetime.

What are the advantage and disadvantage of both?

Life standard gaining is one of the reasons to decide where people prefer living in. The old days, people resided in one place, but nowadays, inhabitants move from one place to another place. I believe I prefer living in different places than remained, beside many job opportunities we also enjoy new experiences, although I can lose contact with families.

When I was a child, it was common to see society to be born, grew up and passed away in the same places in their origin. The advantage of being lingered is people has community spirit, because they always close to their family and friends, knew everyone well and assisted each other. When one of the society member got an accident, other felt it was a must to take responsibility to support. The demerit is people would not have many job chance, they got job in the same company a long their life. As a result of this people would get bored. It concludes living in the same inhabitant is good for the community spirit, but less working opportunity.

Now, community are more mobile, they go to the city that offers a new higher chance carrier. Although they can lose contact with their family, but they relish novel experiences. Because they stay in new environment, work for new job and have a new relationship with community from different back ground. As a result of this, they would be happier than still live in remained. I believe this would be good for everyone to move around.

To sum up, both moving to ample places and just staying remained have advantage and disadvantage. I believe I would rather to choose mobile to another because there is a big chance of vacancy also has a lot of new experiences.

Writing Feedback / Governments must consider the most important aspects to develop their city, due to limited fundings. [3]

Which one is the most important impressive building or public services? - IELTS Task 2

Governments must consider the most important aspect to develop their city, because of the limited funding. A large quantity of society argue extraordinary and spectacular structures are vital to the city, others think schools and hospitals are the most. I strongly believe that to improve the facilities in education and health is more notable than establish buildings in the city, although it makes the town more attractive.

The existence of magnificent structures in metropolis can reform the aesthetics and became as city's identity. Either local people or outsider remember the city as a developed area, the greatness of construction indicates region's progress. Sidney with its Opera demonstrates that this city is progressed city, which is make it more aesthetics. As result of this, the public pursue is not enough to improve other aspects. In conclusion, establish numerous extraordinary constructions is also good but needs more money.

The other hand, I believe that funding for school improvement effects to shrewdness growth in community, because it gives knowledge to the people. High technology building establishment needs a good architect and engineer, who must have consummate skill and knowledge, this requires a good education. The hospitals are also important to give better health service to society, so that they can help the city keep developing. For instance, people with healthy body can do their responsibility, getting sick can postpones the target. As result, the community is good in knowledge and health. So, schools and hospitals development is more important to do.

To sum up, although the magnificent buildings are good, I do believe that schools and hospitals development should be the first priority of the Government's program. Therefore, the Governments should spent more budget to reform in education and public health facilities.