Writing Feedback / Genetically modified crops are potentially dangerous. to what extent do you agree? [3]

Hello friends, could anyone give a score to this essay as an IELTS essay?

In recent years, scientists have achieved remarkable advances in producing crops with modified genes. Despite this state-of-the-art technology would bring about several benefits for the human community, critics have concerns regarding destructive side-effects of it on the environment and human health alike. In my view, people ought to consume genetically modified crops with cautious to avoid any unpredictable situation.

Undoubtedly, genetic engineering is bound to be a predominant means of food production in the years ahead. Thus it would be beneficial in a variety of ways to societies. One overt advantage of this technology is to produce crops, lasting more than organic ones. Therefore, transportation of these food products is set to be more economical. Moreover, scientists by manipulating of genes are able to generate fruits or vegetables which are less allergic. For instance,genetic experts can alleviate the symptoms of allergies in people, sensitive to consume strawberry or eggplant.

By comparison, some people believe genetically modified crops have not been utterly experimented and might lead to some adverse effects on both human bodies and the environment. First of all, environmentalists argue these products are likely to be environmentally-damaging. They claim these crops may not be degradable and remain in the environment for hundred of years. Secondly, physicians contend these food might be detrimental to humans' body system. For example, they may be responsible for emerging of fatal illnesses such as cancer in people.

In conclusion, I personally tend to agree with these concerns regarding consuming of these synthetic foods. I believe authorities should take some precaution measures before making these method of food production industrialize.

Writing Feedback / Email is a fast and convenient way to communicate, and written letters aren't needed anymore. [3]

The advent of email as a replacement of traditional letters has had enormous influences on the means of communications. While the emerging of emails revolutionize either professional or social relationships, the negative aspects of this new technology could not be denied. In my point of view, the benefits of using emails outweigh drawbacks.

Undoubtedly, substitution of paper letters by electronic mails has significant advantages for human community. The first overt advantage of this hi-tech tool is providing a far more convenient way for sending letters. In particular, letters are bound to send at an accelerating pace to everywhere around the globe. Furthermore, using of emails rather than traditional letters contributes to reduction of paper waste, produced from either writing or enveloping letters. For example, regarding to official statistics, the amount of paper waste in recent years in my country have been decreased approximately by 40%. Therefore, more emails have sent, more trees would be saved from logging.

On the other hand, there would be some negative effects regarding implying of emails. Firstly, the emerging of emails has provided a new means of advertising for producers to offer their products or services online. Therefore, individuals would face to several adverts or technically spam emails in their inbox daily. Another concern regarding emails is their vulnerability to cyber fraud. One particularly salient example of this is my grandparent's experience- They had received and email last year, claiming you have been awarded a thousand dollar in a lottery and requiring their credit card detail for transferring the prize.

In conclusion, I personally believe while electronic mails have brought about remarkable advancements in the way of communicating, people ought to apply it as a new way of contacting by taking precaution measures and protect their privacy.