Writing Feedback / Scientist and tourists now able to travel to remote environment. Advantages vs Disadvantages IELTS [2]

It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South Pole. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

It is commonly believed that visiting to isolated natural locations like the North Pole and the Amazon is a very unique experience not only for a research approach but also for a tourism purpose. I believe that as long as all visitors pay more attention to environment issues during their stay, the advantages of traveling such areas outweigh the disadvantages.

First of all, it is generally said that the remote natural places always attract many scientists regarding their study in terms of ecosystem, global warming and other subjects. It helps expand their knowledge by collecting data and samples, and give them opportunities to figure out problems what mankind is facing nowadays such as climate change.

Secondly, remote natural areas are usually known for natural resources, oil, gas and minerals, hence it is essential for researchers to gather accurate information from there in order to manage and develop the resources for human beings' future. In this regards, scientists should take this advantage to accomplish their investigation for mankind.

Furthermore, tourists can also benefit from the current trend as they can experience extraordinary scenery compared with other views they have ever seen. There is no doubt that it is worth a visit such undeveloped tourism places because the chance can offer only once in a life time experience.

However, the most concern from the government and local authorities is that an increase in the number of visitors causes more environmental problems. It is obvious that more buildings for accommodations and restaurants are to be built to serve travellers and this will consequently lead to environmental issues like air pollution and rubbish disposal.

In conclusion, as previously stated, access to remote natural locations provide more benefits to human beings. Therefore, people must be aware of the importance of environment at first in the region.

Writing Feedback / Should the amount of noise people make be controlled strictly or not? IELTS [4]

Q) Some people think that the amount of noise people make should be controlled strictly. Others say that people are free to make as much as they wish. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

It is considered by some that making noise should be vigorously restricted while there are others who insist that it is free to produce regardless how much it would be. In my opinion, I believe that government needs to take a relevant measure to keep the level of noise at public places low while citizens are free to make noise in other areas.

On the one hand, many think that talking loud on a mobile phone at quiet places like in a library or on the bus seriously distracts people's life. For example, this disturbance can affect on individuals' study when students need to concentrate on their exam preparations. In addition to this, excessive noise can cause some health problems such as headaches or sleeping disorder.

On the other hand, some people think that they have freedom to make noise and hence they should not take any responsibility regarding problems caused. They also argue that most people in the modern society have already been suffering from many different types of noises including those from construction works and transport. In this regards, noisy sound from human being has relatively small impact to others.

Finally, in my opinion, whether controlling the amount of people's noise depends on the situation. Government needs to consider implementing a measure to ensure the quality of life at public places like hospitals and public transport where people are recommended to keep quiet. In contrast, citizens should be allowed to make noise as they wish in other places such as parks and playgrounds.

In conclusion, no one wants to be disturbed by others as it is related to individual's right. However, respecting other's right is sometimes more valuable in this modern community.