Growing up in a strict Asian household, I was raised barred by limitations. I used my father's love for music as my own outlet of freedom.
It would be nice if this sentence had a sentence before it and a sentence after it so I (the reader) could deeply understand its meaning and significance.
...not of
just existing but of
living.
This part doesn't seem to make sense: If words could express, then there is no reason to sing.
I'm sorry, I don't get what you mean!
You should invest a full paragraph each time you give a complicated idea, like this one ----->
It is not the magic of singing but the magic that is singing that provides a push.
You do write the rest of a paragraph after saying this, but the rest of the paragraph is not about the difference between the magic of and the magic that is. When you toss a complicated idea at the reader, you should dive into it in explanation.
This would make a good first paragraph: Singing is universal. It transcends cultural barriers and unites people from diverse backgrounds through one language. Realizing the importance of a united voice, I became a leader- one that contests, one that knows compromise. Just like in singing, you "crescendo" and "decrescendo" when only needed.-------but then you have to show how you have been a leader, and show how you applied the principle of using "crescendo" and "decrescendo" when only needed.
:-)