The prompt is "Imagine you have graduated from Temple University. You are preparing to attend your 10-year reunion, and the alumni office has asked you to write a one-page essay about your personal and professional accomplishments since graduation. What would yours say?"
At first, I took the prompt very literally. I was very specific. I toned it down but I still described exact things I want to have done, places to have visit and potential jobs, and even an ideal description on how I want my future house to look. It was very ambitious and specific. But people at CollegeConfidential told me setting a predetermined path might not be a good approach for this essay.
So I made another one where I tried to be broad and vague. Focused on how I grew up as a person, the set of skills I have achieved, and the relevance of my college years to it.
Which approach do you think is better for this one? Should I lose the specific too-ambitious tone?
At first, I took the prompt very literally. I was very specific. I toned it down but I still described exact things I want to have done, places to have visit and potential jobs, and even an ideal description on how I want my future house to look. It was very ambitious and specific. But people at CollegeConfidential told me setting a predetermined path might not be a good approach for this essay.
So I made another one where I tried to be broad and vague. Focused on how I grew up as a person, the set of skills I have achieved, and the relevance of my college years to it.
Which approach do you think is better for this one? Should I lose the specific too-ambitious tone?