The writer has composed a non scorable restatement + writers opinion. Rather than paraphrasing the topic, the writer offered a personal opinion sentence. That created a discussion statement instead. The writer also failed to deliver clear thesis discussion points in response to the questions posed. Both actions ran counter to the expected response format for that paragraph, resulting in a failing consideration for that task section. A passing score cannot be provided when writing instructions are not met in that section's preliminary scoring phase.
The swell in population begets the purification of air in jeopardy.
There is a lack of evidence that will support this claim.The paragraph is therefore underdeveloped in relation to creating a cohesive paragraph discussion. Always offer examples to support such claims.
The writer is not properly using descriptive and discussion words in this essay. The words used are unnatural and come across more as an oration rather than an everyday discussion. The LR score will also notbe impressive because of this.
Overall, I believe that the essay will not pass once all scoring considerations are totalled. This is regardless of the obvious effort the exam taker has placed in developing the discussion and reasoning paragraphs.