Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime.Others,however,argue that the circumstances of an individual crime,and the motivation for commiting it,should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Throughout the history ,crime and punishment always has been a controversial matter.In this regard,some group of people always argue that there must be constant and firm penalties for each type of offence .While others think that all of the crimes have to be investigated exactly as well as circumstances and motivation should be considered for judging and punishing them fairly.
Some people believe that penalties have to be determined beforehand for every type of offences.They claim that it simplifies judging criminals and by this way similar crimes can be gathered under same codes.It is believed that an identical penalty for an individual crime may stop a criminal person to commit a crime by reconsidering the consequences of its behaviour.Moreover,they support this idea that to take into account motivation for commiting crimes and circumstances create stalemate situation and redundant delay in judicial process.
On the other hand,some people including me,believe that all types of crimes must be investigated with great care and all of the internal and external factors should be considered.Let's take two murderer for an example who has killed someone.One of them,have commited it for the aim of self-defence,while other has done it because of robbery,torture,aggression or maybe merely for enjoyment as maniac.In my opinion, taking into account both of these murders as a same type of crime and penalizing them in the same way would be injustice.Therefore,it is very essential explore situation of crime and whole of the causes which have bring about to these bad consequences.I believe that just decisions can be made only after well-organized investigations by considering all of the influencing factors.
In conclusion,crime and punishment have always existed and the main thing is not to punish but to penalize fairly.
Throughout the history ,crime and punishment always has been a controversial matter.In this regard,some group of people always argue that there must be constant and firm penalties for each type of offence .While others think that all of the crimes have to be investigated exactly as well as circumstances and motivation should be considered for judging and punishing them fairly.
Some people believe that penalties have to be determined beforehand for every type of offences.They claim that it simplifies judging criminals and by this way similar crimes can be gathered under same codes.It is believed that an identical penalty for an individual crime may stop a criminal person to commit a crime by reconsidering the consequences of its behaviour.Moreover,they support this idea that to take into account motivation for commiting crimes and circumstances create stalemate situation and redundant delay in judicial process.
On the other hand,some people including me,believe that all types of crimes must be investigated with great care and all of the internal and external factors should be considered.Let's take two murderer for an example who has killed someone.One of them,have commited it for the aim of self-defence,while other has done it because of robbery,torture,aggression or maybe merely for enjoyment as maniac.In my opinion, taking into account both of these murders as a same type of crime and penalizing them in the same way would be injustice.Therefore,it is very essential explore situation of crime and whole of the causes which have bring about to these bad consequences.I believe that just decisions can be made only after well-organized investigations by considering all of the influencing factors.
In conclusion,crime and punishment have always existed and the main thing is not to punish but to penalize fairly.
