While some government lean towards the view point
that fossil fuels are the major source of energy for most countries but green energy should be used substitute. From my point of view, I partly agree with this opinion and think that crude oil and green energy should be encouraged for simultaneous using. Although fossil fuels account for the vast majority of energy in most countries, it is also a double-edged sword.
On the one hand, alternative source et energy are not always available. In some areas which have narrow terrain and different natural conditions, setting up things like wind mills or solar panels is a challenging issue for them. For examples wind energy can not be used in the country that does not have coastline like Laos. Not only that, not every government has enough finance to invest in natural power. Installing solar panels for building hydropower factory costs too much money, which can be a obstacle to people who do not have well-off wage.
On the other hand, fossil fuels are non-renewables energy, it will run out in the foreseeable future. With current overexploitation petroleum, it likely to be exhausted soon. In addition, the factory that turns crude oil into power discharges exhaust fumes into the atmosphere, which result in greenhouse effect is and global warming. Contrast with natural energy, it do not cause pollution and environmentally friendly. In some developed county, government has introduced public transport using green energy into use widely
On balance, crude oil make up the majority of energy for most nation but natural energy should be used instead. It seems to me that everything has two sides of it, human should use at the same time both fossil fuels and alternative source of energy for high efficiency.
that fossil fuels are the major source of energy for most countries but green energy should be used substitute. From my point of view, I partly agree with this opinion and think that crude oil and green energy should be encouraged for simultaneous using. Although fossil fuels account for the vast majority of energy in most countries, it is also a double-edged sword.
On the one hand, alternative source et energy are not always available. In some areas which have narrow terrain and different natural conditions, setting up things like wind mills or solar panels is a challenging issue for them. For examples wind energy can not be used in the country that does not have coastline like Laos. Not only that, not every government has enough finance to invest in natural power. Installing solar panels for building hydropower factory costs too much money, which can be a obstacle to people who do not have well-off wage.
On the other hand, fossil fuels are non-renewables energy, it will run out in the foreseeable future. With current overexploitation petroleum, it likely to be exhausted soon. In addition, the factory that turns crude oil into power discharges exhaust fumes into the atmosphere, which result in greenhouse effect is and global warming. Contrast with natural energy, it do not cause pollution and environmentally friendly. In some developed county, government has introduced public transport using green energy into use widely
On balance, crude oil make up the majority of energy for most nation but natural energy should be used instead. It seems to me that everything has two sides of it, human should use at the same time both fossil fuels and alternative source of energy for high efficiency.