The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014
The line graph details the percentage of changing prices every month of three metals ( copper, nickel, zinc). Overall, the costs of all metals in the graph in the first half year fluctuated with a downward trend. It is also noticeable that the price of copper did not have too many changes in one year.
In detail, in the first month, nickel topped of the list, but during 6 months, the percentage of nickel cost plunged rapidly from 6% to -3%. Regarding metals such as copper and zinc, there was a slight fall in the costs. As for copper, after rising significantly, the percentage of copper prices dipped moderately, after that the figure for zinc saw a marginal decline between 2% and 0,5%.
In the second half of the year, the prices of 3 metals grew again. During one month, the figure for copper, nickel, and zinc increased slightly before the 3 metals remained unchanged between July and September. After that, there were moderate climb, at about 1%(nickel), 1,5%(copper), and 2%(zinc).Holt Educational Consultant - / 14,864 4788 It is difficult to follow the discussion presentation. You have not clearly summarized the image provided. Aside from the summary of the measurement topic, you should have also indicated the years, months, and measurement basis in the paragraph. Regardless, you made a good trending statement though. That is where the good part of this presentation ends.
By not indicating the correct months and years referenced in the report, you have left the reader confused as to how to interpret the information. What is the basis? How do they separate the information? What is the correct comparison point? There is no way the reader can read this essay as a clear and definitive presentation. Next time, make sure to clarify the reference points by actually using these in the presentation.