Some people believe that professional athletes should be role models for young people. Others argue that athletes' personal lives should not influence their public image. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether expert athletes should be adolescent role models. Despite their significantly profound influence on young people, I believe that their lives ought to be separated from the public image.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people think that professional athletes should become an exceptional example for teenagers. To begin with, skillful people involved in sports are usually thought to be role models who can embolden young people. One of the most commonly cited reasons is that athletes often demonstrate discipline, hard work, and perseverance, which are crucial qualities that adolescents can emulate. By observing how athletes maintain strict training regimens, follow dietary guidelines, and overcome injuries or failures, young people can learn the importance of consistency and dedication in pursuing their goals. Moreover, athletes frequently set goals and work tirelessly to achieve them, which can teach teenagers the value of setting personal objectives and striving towards them, regardless of obstacles. For instance, a young person might be motivated to engage in sports and develop a healthier lifestyle by following the example of a disciplined athlete. As a result, this can extend beyond physical fitness, encouraging the youth to adopt a more structured approach to their academics or other pursuits.
On the other hand, I firmly hold the view that sports experts' lives should be separated from their civil abstracts. First and foremost, everyone has flaws, and it is important to recognize that athletes are human beings with private lives, just like anyone else. This can be explained that they may face personal challenges or make mistakes that do not necessarily reflect their professional abilities or public persona. In addition, focusing too much on the personal lives of athletes can detract from their achievements and contributions to their sport. Therefore, society should allow athletes to maintain a level of privacy and separate their struggles from their public roles as entertainers and sports figures. Besides, a sports expert who excels in the field may not have a perfect personal life, but their achievements in sports should be the primary focus. Taking Michael Phelps, an American former competitive swimmer, as a common example, despite facing personal challenges, is primarily celebrated for his unparalleled success in swimming rather than his private life.
In conclusion, although professional athletes being ideal models for teenagers is advantageous to some extent, it seems to me that it is better to let them have privacy without suffering from their public appearances.
People have different views about whether expert athletes should be adolescent role models. Despite their significantly profound influence on young people, I believe that their lives ought to be separated from the public image.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people think that professional athletes should become an exceptional example for teenagers. To begin with, skillful people involved in sports are usually thought to be role models who can embolden young people. One of the most commonly cited reasons is that athletes often demonstrate discipline, hard work, and perseverance, which are crucial qualities that adolescents can emulate. By observing how athletes maintain strict training regimens, follow dietary guidelines, and overcome injuries or failures, young people can learn the importance of consistency and dedication in pursuing their goals. Moreover, athletes frequently set goals and work tirelessly to achieve them, which can teach teenagers the value of setting personal objectives and striving towards them, regardless of obstacles. For instance, a young person might be motivated to engage in sports and develop a healthier lifestyle by following the example of a disciplined athlete. As a result, this can extend beyond physical fitness, encouraging the youth to adopt a more structured approach to their academics or other pursuits.
On the other hand, I firmly hold the view that sports experts' lives should be separated from their civil abstracts. First and foremost, everyone has flaws, and it is important to recognize that athletes are human beings with private lives, just like anyone else. This can be explained that they may face personal challenges or make mistakes that do not necessarily reflect their professional abilities or public persona. In addition, focusing too much on the personal lives of athletes can detract from their achievements and contributions to their sport. Therefore, society should allow athletes to maintain a level of privacy and separate their struggles from their public roles as entertainers and sports figures. Besides, a sports expert who excels in the field may not have a perfect personal life, but their achievements in sports should be the primary focus. Taking Michael Phelps, an American former competitive swimmer, as a common example, despite facing personal challenges, is primarily celebrated for his unparalleled success in swimming rather than his private life.
In conclusion, although professional athletes being ideal models for teenagers is advantageous to some extent, it seems to me that it is better to let them have privacy without suffering from their public appearances.