In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a wide range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
It is reported that secondary pupils in some countries are provided with an educational curriculum that covers a wide range of subjects. In others, however, more emphasis is being placed on particular groups of subjects that might benefit students' career paths. For today's world, although general education might bring undeniable benefits, I firmly believe that narrowly-focused education is more appropriate.
To begin with, it is suggested that general education provides students with background knowledge that might be fundamental to their entire lives. Firstly, studying a variety of subjects, from mathematics to history, enables young learners to know how the world functions. Secondly, being exposed to knowledge from various fields indicates that students can develop and have their own preferences. For example, Vietnamese students are educated with thirteen subjects from scientifically-related topics to civil-education. From those choices of subjects, students might determine their individual interests, hence, invest more in those interests in high school education.
Despite the fact that general education offers a solid background knowledge, it is concerned that such education is also responsible for the situation in which students are dis-oriented with their studies.
Perhaps the most effective remedy for this disorientation is specialized education in which students only practice skills that aim for their careers. For example, a future neuro-physicist needs not to master literature, or a musician does not have to be fluent in computing language. Those examples signify the fact that people do not need all knowledge. In contrast. A more narrow focus on particular subjects should be prioritized. It is highly believed that the more specialized a candidate is, the more appealing he or she becomes in the labor market. In today's world of innovation and AI, employers are seeking talents with highly-specialized competencies, regardless of their past academic grades.
To sum up, although some countries are providing general education, I firmly believe that specialized education is a more appropriate approach for today's world.
319 words
For today's world, which system is appropriate ?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
It is reported that secondary pupils in some countries are provided with an educational curriculum that covers a wide range of subjects. In others, however, more emphasis is being placed on particular groups of subjects that might benefit students' career paths. For today's world, although general education might bring undeniable benefits, I firmly believe that narrowly-focused education is more appropriate.
To begin with, it is suggested that general education provides students with background knowledge that might be fundamental to their entire lives. Firstly, studying a variety of subjects, from mathematics to history, enables young learners to know how the world functions. Secondly, being exposed to knowledge from various fields indicates that students can develop and have their own preferences. For example, Vietnamese students are educated with thirteen subjects from scientifically-related topics to civil-education. From those choices of subjects, students might determine their individual interests, hence, invest more in those interests in high school education.
Despite the fact that general education offers a solid background knowledge, it is concerned that such education is also responsible for the situation in which students are dis-oriented with their studies.
Perhaps the most effective remedy for this disorientation is specialized education in which students only practice skills that aim for their careers. For example, a future neuro-physicist needs not to master literature, or a musician does not have to be fluent in computing language. Those examples signify the fact that people do not need all knowledge. In contrast. A more narrow focus on particular subjects should be prioritized. It is highly believed that the more specialized a candidate is, the more appealing he or she becomes in the labor market. In today's world of innovation and AI, employers are seeking talents with highly-specialized competencies, regardless of their past academic grades.
To sum up, although some countries are providing general education, I firmly believe that specialized education is a more appropriate approach for today's world.
319 words