Writing Feedback / ESSAY: The power of speaking or writing [2]

Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree?

The issue of speaking or writing is widely debated , due to the influence of them in conversation.Personally, i advocate this point of view, and i will explain why in this essay

Firstly, we have to consider about the human mind , with expressions and body gestures , the language that we speak become more lively than ever.At some extend , it creates extremely impact on the way we grasp the information . For example, there are a lot of motivators out there speaking in front of thousand of people through their stories , they show manifold of body and face expressions in order to transfer the meaning of their speech more effectively , and highlight the crucial point which will help the listeners able to capture the information for a long-term benefit in a way that writing paper cannot .According a video TED TALK that i have listened recently, the place where many people in the world come and share their stories in different tasks,areas and aspects, a professor who said that speaking have a significant influence ,we can lower or higher our pitch to emphasize ,and if the speaker know how to fully embrace it , the potential is unlimited . Hence it is often considered more versatile.

I do understand the opposing view, which is that in some other terms of communicate, writing could be the better option. For instant , people who lack of interacting , who are more likely to write sentences which can touch readers heart and express the meaning. Moreover , writing can preserve ,unlike speech.Nevertheless, in effect aspect , writing is rarely acquire higher reaction than speaking which make speaking far outweigh writing.

Overall , i believe that speaking is the wiser course for influencers to strive for based on the effect it brings to people.

THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME

Writing Feedback / Today, TV channels provide man's sport shows more than women's sport shows, why? personal opinion? [3]

are Sportsmen more entertaining than sportswomen?

While sport channels are widely spread all over the world, men's participation are more likely to show up on television rather than women due to interest . Personally, i do feel this is understandable and i will explain why in this essay.

On the one hand , as we can see ,television is consumed as an entertainment device, that is why the directors critically focus on the content of the channels in order to absorb the attention of viewers. Man sports acquire suspense moments, amazing skills,strength and violent actions which may attract countless male viewers. For instance, in a football match, male playground frequently witness plot twist, versatility and drama, whereas female seems to be rarely have these factors and underperformance. Thus , in spectators perspective , it is less pleasant . If the reaction was different lead to the unequal in profit and investment, it could impact on the outcome of selection in content .

On the other hand,i do believe that women attempt in sports illustrate enormous potential of skills in manifold match. it should not always be men priority if the quality of the match is obviously better. Nevertheless, in terms of sport channels, it is not only about the gender equality, but also about the people needs which need concern in many aspects.

In conclusion , i strongly advocate the former option rather than the later because of a wider audience watching men's sports channels. It is about how much it influence on people as spectators and producers, in entertainment and profits, there is nothing involved in gender equability