Writing Feedback / Teachers lost their roles in modern education? [5]

Teacher used to convey information,but now with wide resources of information,there is no role for teachers to play in modern education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Technology development has revolutionized the methodology of education. Peolple now can access wide range of information easily through internet. Therefore, some people think teachers will lose their role which is to convey information in modern education soon. As for as I am concerned , I doubt strongly the possibility of this assertion.

There is no denying that teachers will not be replaced in all kinds of aspects.
In the first place , teachers won't be replaced where those wide resources can not cover. For example, in some impoverished area lack of electric and transportation, people hve no such modern equipments, and teachers become the most affordable channel for them to acquire information.

In the second place, some special education for the disabled only are carried out by teachers. For example,the blind can't see and the deaf can't hear those active multi-media classes. In order to boost social harmonious development, the government should hire teachers to service them.Besides,some courses rely on teachers like football and swimming, modern facilities just can be adopted as a tools to improve their performance.

Granted,modern education can bring us many benefits. Firstly, with the popularity of internet education, student won't go to school and can learn many courses at home,which save their time and cost. Secondly,for government, because they need not build and maintain tons of classrooms and hire employees, a great number of budget can be saved and used to invest in other urgent fields. But even if modern education has so many advantages, teachers will not lose their important positions in modern education. Teachers can learn how to use modern technology and adopt them into their classes, and make their teaching more effective and active.

In sum, despite that modern resources have many advantages and replace teacher's positon in some extent, teachers will still act as core roles in modern education.

Writing Feedback / Robots have negative effects on society and sometimes are even dangerous - IELTS essay [2]

Some people think that robots are very important for human future development.Others,however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Robots, a great invention in the 20th century, have entered into every corner of human life. When it comes to its influence to human future development, people hold different views. One think robots are very important,while the other contend they are dangerous and could have negative effects on society. As far as I am concerned, both their views have some merit.

There is no denying that robots can bring about tons of benefits. In the first place, compared with human, robots need not rest and can work on 7 x24, which ensure them work more effective. In the second place, robots can work in serious or even dangerous environment where folks can not survive. For example,folks can not bear under the environment with extreme high,low temperature or full of radiation, robots, howvever can handle critical issues instead. As some reports said,robots have been used to solver critical problems in nuclear plant instead of human.

It is remarkable that there are many negative influences on human society brought by robots as well. Firstly, the wide use of robots probably increases the unemployment rate. with the enrollment of robots and improvement of working efficiency, factories need not so many labors that many people are fired. Secondly, robots work by following some designated instructors. in some urgent and dangerous situation, robots can not adjust automaticly to fit the change and lead to serious consequence.Thirdly, the widespread use of robots decrease the independence of human on machines, weaken the creativity ability of human indirectly.

In sum, I concede that robots have the negative effects on society and sometimes are even dangerous. However, compared with the benefits they bring, those disadvantages are not worth mentioning.On balance, robots will act as an important role and contribute to human society soon.

Writing Feedback / the responsibility of government and new buildings' style [3]

The government is responsible for protecting a nation's cultural identify. Thus, some people believe new buildings should be built in traditional styles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion?

Nowadays, it becomes a well-known fact that a nation's cultural identify is an essential heritage. But when it comes to the cultural identify protection, people hold divergent views. Some people argue that new building should follow traditional styles. As far as I am concerned, I strongly doubt its possibility.

There is no denying that protecting a nation's cultural identify is not the government's main responsibility. Except it, the government have a host of works to do. For example, the government should give priority to transportation, education and society safety. Secondly, compared with the government, every individual should take more responsibility of nation identify protection, because buildings' style is just one of nation culture identify which contains music, dance and other artistic forms as well. People, as a carrier of artistic tradition should improve their awareness of cultural identify protection, then participate in various activities in protecting traditional cultural identify provide by the governments. Only can this way facilitate cultural identify protection more effective. Last but not least, a new building's style is determined by various factors. Besides cultural identify protection, people need to consider the environment, the geography position and other conditions. For example, we cannot build a supermarket with traditional style near suburb area, which is inconsistent with the skyscrapers nearby.

Granted, more building with traditional style can improve the coverage rate of a nation's culture identify. But too many buildings with same traditional style could make new visual pollutions.

Based on the above analysis, I concede that new buildings follow traditional style do contribute to protect cultural identify. However, compared with some harms it brings, the advantage is not worth mentioning. On balance, I think the government should focus on the living, education and other critical issues. Every individual can shoulder the responsibility of protection cultural identify.