Writing Feedback / Positives and negatives of product globalization [2]

Topic:
Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Essay:
The vigorous explosion of globalization have laid the foundation for the free trade among nations whereby their citizens are capable of consuming parallel commodities. Although I agree that there are various drawbacks stemming from this development, they can be esclipsed by its benefits.

On the one hand, there are a variety of advantages of product globalization. Firstly, it would foster the economic growth of those countries. This is because business freely allows goods which are redundant can be exported to others needing them. As a result, it enables companies in both countries reap more profit, and simultaneously it contribute to the national budget through export and import taxes. Secondly, customers would have options to purchase products having a higher quality and a more reasonable price. Indeed, domestic companies need to have their own strategies such as improving designs, diversifing products or reducing the price to have capability to complete with external corporations.Without product globalization, local companies tent to offer opposite policies reducing client's benefits.

On the other hand, this is not to say that we can neglect disadvantages of this phenomanon. Admittedly, several domestic products would be liable to be disappeared when their customers value international items above other things. This is exemplified in a study undertaken by Vietnamese Economists. They indicated that about 35 Vietnamese cosmetic companies were ruined in 2018 bacause of their limitted competitive ability with other products from Korea, Japan and the UK. Moreover, it leads to business freely of some low quality products causing hazards to customer's health. For example, formula branch in China were banned to be exported by other countries after detecting a toxic product endangering the brain. Nonetheless, I strongly believe that the benefit of product globalization is more considerable in comparision with its drawbacks especially in current market-oriented market.

After discussing all the points mentioned above, I can finally conclude that globalization brings in various positives, and it utterly can overweigh its negatives. Thus, both government and individuals should have futher consideration in favour of this trend.

Writing Feedback / Whether university students should study whatever they like or not [3]

Which subjects for students?

Topic: Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Essay:
A much debated question is whether undergraduates should have the right to choose fields according to their aspiration or they are obligated to study future-oriented subjects. whilst being chosen subjects freely recieves widespread support, the advocacy of focusing on compulsory ones also emerges noticeably. To express my utter approval towards the latter view and provide an unbiased scale, this essay with evaluate both sides of the debate.

One the one hand, there are some arguments in favor of the fact that universities should give the freedom for students to opt their suitable subjects. Firstly, this policy will restrict students to study what they have no interest at all. If students were obliged to learn subjects associated with technology or science without any enthusiasm, it would lead to unexpected results. Secondly, undergraduates are given the chance to challange themselves with enormous fields and hence to strengthen their expertise. For example, a technical student could choose to study economics as a way to accumulate necessesary skills like communicate or persuasive skills.

One the other hand, those harbour the opposite viewpoint usually debunk the previous one by stating consequences of opting without any orientations. Admittedly, undergraduates do not have suffiecient knowledges which is essential for their carrer. This is because students tend to study easy subjects and ignore crutial ones for the purpose is getting high scores. With the labour market becoming increasingly competitive, lacking basic understanding enables graduates to face unemployed sittuation. This can be illustrated in the study undertaken by American professors. They indicated that the percentage of the jobless because they are inadequate science or technology skills occupies up to sixty percent in the total number of reasons causing unemployments. Thus, although there is no denying for advantages of choosing fields freely, in current modern society, it is more important for university students to study oriented subjects.

In conclusion, I believe that students should study compulsory subjects associate with their future. Universitiy also should have consideration to choose the optimal subject lists to ensure graduate's carrer prospect.