Writing Feedback / SOCIETY;children are to be great fellows or not depend on learning and good idol [2]

Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In our society, children are to be perfect fellows or not depend on learning and good idol. While a lot of people believe that parents should to instruct their children, a large number of them regard as school is the place to learn to be perfect fellows. In my opinion, both groups are correct in different reasons.

On one hand, parents should to teach their children about good person in the association. Since primary institution is family unit. According to my experience, my elder brother is taught about kindness and self-sacrifice which are the base of perfect man by parents when he was young. At present, my brother is a good man in society and he is my idol to follow.

On the other hand, educational institution is the place where the children can learn about living and perfect fellows in their society because there are many children in variety of lifestyles, national backgrounds, and habit that make them to adjust their sociability. They can trial and error by themselves. According to my young life, I learn to choose friends and do anything by myself in the school. I learn to do good things from my teachers and friends.

In the final analysis, both parents and schools can instruct children to be good fellows in society. However, I believe that family institutional is the first institute which is children found. Consequently, parents are very importance to teach their children and do anything as a good model that children can do follow.

Writing Feedback / IELTS; New fashion of doing multiple careers [3]

The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life.

Nowadays, technology has influenced to people. It brings a lot of changes to their life which one of changes is their works. Single career was very popular in the past but it is becoming an old fashioned now. Due to new technology play important roles to many fields of work. According to my experience and observation, people have to try to learn multi-skilled or higher education for better life.

Admittedly, almost of people in past had only one profession. They worked about eight hours per day and spent their free time with families and friends. Their lives were more simply and fine than in today. However, lifestyle of new generation is not same as the past anymore because of higher competition. In order to get a good occupation, they need to study more and more in many subjects. The new generation has to show that they have more capable and potential than others. It is very common that the companies will choose hotspot or multi-skilled person for making the highest useful to the firms. In addition, if people want to earn much money, they will learn more subjects such as Computers, Arts, Sciences, Management, so on. These are very useful for applying to their works.

In the modern world, people need to learn multi-skilling, get high education and improve knowledge all the time for prevent losing jobs and attain high salaries that continue throughout life. I predict that there are many developments of sciences increasingly in the future. Who want to be out-of-date thinking?

Writing Feedback / financial preparedness; wealthy nations sharing their wealth with poorer nations [3]

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

Nowadays, there are many poorer countries that are the important world-class problems. Some people think that wealthy countries should share their wealth to the poorer countries by supplying food and education. Others believe that the governments of the poorer countries are responsible for their people themselves. In my opinion, I prefer to the rich nations should to help the undeveloped countries because they have perfectly resources such as financial, human, and natural resources.

In the beginning, the wealthy nations have financial preparedness certainly. So, they can help the poorer countries to increase survival of the poor. United States, regarded as the richest country in the world, usually give much money to assist Africa which is the poorer nation for supporting their public health, consumption, and education.

In case of individual resources, due to the developed countries have much opportunity in every field, almost of people have well-educated. In order to help about education of the poorer nations, the rich nations can send the capable teachers to teach the poor children which are very important basis to develop the poorer nations.

Another reason that supports my opinion is plentiful natural resources of the wealthy countries. They can provide their food, oil, crops, and so on to the poorer countries. For instance, China, where is the one of the abundant country in the Asia, set up the fundamental to support and contribute the nutritive food to Africa.

In conclusion, I believe that the wealthy nations should to assist the poorer nations by providing food, education, and so on because they have profuse resources in term of finance, human, and nature that the poorer nations do not have them. Therefore, it is better than the governments of the poorer countries will take care of their people alone. I predict that the poorer countries will be developed increasingly by assistance of the wealthy. I would suggest the government of all nations should to coordinate each other tightly. Who will want to hold this practice?