Writing Feedback / Smoking should be made prohibited in public places : IELTS [2]

It has been proved that smoking kills. In some countries it has been made illegal for people to smoke in all public places except in certain areas. All countries should make these rules.

Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Can someone to correct this if there are any mistakes.

People the world over have designated smoothing as a shameful practice and a lethal habit. Several millions of smokers die suffering from cancers such as lung and oral. This bad habit also responsible for causing health hazards to passive-smokers: who are around smoking is taken place. Thus, it is argued that smoking should be made prohibited in public places such as bus and railway stations. This position will be proven by looking at how this arrangement has benefited both general public as well as smokers.

To start, non-smoking public would be undoubtedly benefited by enforcing such restrain. Prior to 1980's public places in Sri Lanka, illustrates unpleasant situation where people smoked freely. Even in public transportation they engaged in this intolerant bad habit, some instances that lead to belligerent incidents. After enforcing restrictions the situation came to control and this act as benefit rendered to the public.

In addition to this, introducing smoking ban in public places would greatly discourage people from engaging tobacco puffing. For instance, further enforcement banned smoking in capital in Sri Lanka has reduced this consumption related diseases and deaths, as per the ministry of health. As this shows, smoking restrictions has successfully daunted public from this bad puffing that put less strain on country's healthcare systems.

After analyzing smoke illegalization in public places in Sri Lanka, it has been proven benefits people enjoy this arrangement. It is thus hoped governments would consider smoke banning in public places following footsteps of Sri Lanka as well as many other countries.

Writing Feedback / The convenience and security enjoy more by the people who live in apartments [3]

This is for IELTS
Topic:
Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment.
Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in house compared with living in an apartment?

Everyone dreams for a better housing experience and housing preferences are wary among people due to various factors. Most common dwelling options available to the people in the contemporary world, are houses and sky-scrapping apartments. Although some concern about privacy and freedom in the apartments, it is argued that this living arrangement poses with more pros than cons compared to the houses. This position will be proven by looking at facts relate to convenience and security.

On the one hand, one's living experience should be attributed with convenience. For example, garbage collection and gas supply in many residencies in Colombo have arranged by the respective service providers and residents are free from engaging these sorts of chores. It is rare to see these sort of eclectic services are provided for house-dwellers in many cities. Thus, it is easy to see the freedom that enjoy by the people in the apartments.

On to the other hand, residencies typically provide with twenty-four hour security to the residents and their properties and it is yet another benefit apartment-dwellers enjoy. The success in this arrangement can be seen when compare the crime rates in these two housing options. A report published by the city police has clearly indicated that serious offences have reported mostly from area of outside the apartments. As this shows, residencies are the safer place to be lived compared to the houses.

After analyzing the convenience and security enjoy more by the people who live in apartments, it has been proven that residencies are the nice to be lived. It is thus hoped people would consider these housing-traits when selecting a living model for their well-being.

Writing Feedback / Some people believe that children's leisure activities must be educational [6]

Education plays a big part in developing a child to be a constructive citizen. In addition to this, physical and recreational activities such as sports and music too, contribute. It is thus, argued that engaging in non-educational endeavors is not a waste of time for a child as some suggest. This position will be proven by looking at how extracurricular activities can instill a child to be strengthening both physically and mentally.

Firstly, being strong in physically is precursor to a young person even for educational activities. For instance, a recent study carried out by a think tank of the United States revealed a positive correlation between children's physically active time and their number of medical treatments per year. As this example shows, it is obvious that if a child engages most of the time in academia he bars from physical activities. Thus, it is not a waste of time being physically active in his favorite sports.

In addition to this, non-educational doings enhance child mentally and, it is a blessing for a country's future. Returning to previous research it was exposed that there is a link between some childhood mental disorders like Aspergers and lack of engagements in leisure activities such as music. As this example shows, it is best to create an environment and provide room for a child to free from education in his leisure time.

After analyzing facts relate to child's physical and metal well being, it has been proven that extra curriculum activities are not to be hinder by academia. Thus, it is hoped parents the world over would make due consideration in balancing their children's day-to-day activities.

Writing Feedback / Being a celebrity has plenty of benefits than downsides [6]

Existence of famous people is not a new phenomenon. The fame, these people have gather around them solely because their outstanding abilities in their fields and, compared to the early days, it can be seen celebrities in abundance at the present due to various reasons. It is felt that the people with fame benefit with more pros than cons. This position will be supported by the affluence they have gathered and how the life they enjoy with mush more spirit.

Firstly, wealth the celebrities have acquired is very much higher than compared to the other people. For instance, monthly revenue of a prominent professional is lower to that of a famous musician or actor, commonly without proper educational background. Apart from their main profession this group earns extra income commonly by appearing in promoting goods and services which are another very profitable business and, again that is not available to others. It is also, hard to see any narrowing this gap. Thus, it is easy to see the financial gain that celebrities enjoy is abundance.

In addition to that, pleasing life which famous people experience is simply not achievable for many ordinaries. For instance, look at the cheer they frequently receive in public appearances and the nice spirit they show in these occasions. Were they having not such fame; they will not receive such receptions. As this shows, pleasure these people acquire due their fame is numerous.

After looking at the above, it is seen that, being a celebrity has plenty of benefits than downsides. It is also assumed this advantageous position is going to exits into a foreseeable future.