Would anyone mind proofreading and critiquing my Why Columbia essay? I tried to take a unique, yet honest approach to it.
Please tell us what you find most appealing about Columbia and why.
In 1968, Columbia University found itself at the center of the social climate that characterized the late sixties with student protests aimed at the controversial Vietnam War, racial injustice, and mistreatment against the community by the University. Regardless of personal views, and although the consequences were not all positive, the protests demonstrate the spirit of the student body - of progress, of social consciousness, and independent thought.
Nearly forty years later, Columbia found itself at the center of societal controversy once more with the invitation of the polarizing Iranian President Ahmadinejad to speak. The invitation was controversial due to Ahmadinejad's radical and even illogical views. But once more, regardless of personal opinion on Ahmadinejad, the invitation serves to show Columbia's dedication to higher learning and freedom of speech. The invitation promoted dialogue and an open exchange of ideas with a figure that represents diametrically opposing views with the majority of the Columbia student body. To me, that is what higher learning and education is about.
These two events, separated by forty years, exemplify the unique appeal Columbia has over every other university. Columbia, supported by an intelligent, conscious student body, is more than a University; it's an institution of progress, discussion, and freedom of thought.
Please tell us what you find most appealing about Columbia and why.
In 1968, Columbia University found itself at the center of the social climate that characterized the late sixties with student protests aimed at the controversial Vietnam War, racial injustice, and mistreatment against the community by the University. Regardless of personal views, and although the consequences were not all positive, the protests demonstrate the spirit of the student body - of progress, of social consciousness, and independent thought.
Nearly forty years later, Columbia found itself at the center of societal controversy once more with the invitation of the polarizing Iranian President Ahmadinejad to speak. The invitation was controversial due to Ahmadinejad's radical and even illogical views. But once more, regardless of personal opinion on Ahmadinejad, the invitation serves to show Columbia's dedication to higher learning and freedom of speech. The invitation promoted dialogue and an open exchange of ideas with a figure that represents diametrically opposing views with the majority of the Columbia student body. To me, that is what higher learning and education is about.
These two events, separated by forty years, exemplify the unique appeal Columbia has over every other university. Columbia, supported by an intelligent, conscious student body, is more than a University; it's an institution of progress, discussion, and freedom of thought.
