Cyclists and motorists sharing the same roads causes some issues. What are the problems and solution

consequences of sharing the same roads between motorists and cyclists

It is true that the usage of the same roads by cyclists and motorists could be the culprit of several problems. While this is a serious issue, some measures should be taken to alleviate it.

The main issue of sharing the same roads is that there are numerous accidents, especially for cyclists who are prone to injuries from colliding with cars. Due to the fact that motorists could fail to be aware of other road users when some cyclists do not abide by the rules of the roads or stand out of sight of car drivers. For example, some motorists turn left or turn right without realizing cyclists near them, which could put cyclists at stake. Another problem is that many commuters using the roads simultaneously could give rise to traffic congestion. Therefore, this might deprive commuters of time and energy, followed by their poor work productivity.

Since such issues have several negative impacts, the government should take steps to address these problems. Firstly, they should have prioritized expenditure on road safety. In other words, they could allocate money for transport infrastructure such as expanding public systems and constructing more cycle lanes on busy roads. Secondly, it is advisable for governments to introduce a restriction on car drivers by imposing a congestion charge and upgrading side roads as modern as the main road. As a result, this might discourage motorists from entering the city center.

In conclusion, there are various negative consequences of sharing the same roads between motorists and cyclists and appropriate steps need to be taken to tackle these problems.

When you are not being asked if a statement is true or false, you do not need to indicate the "truth" of a statement in the restated topic. It is not necessary to do so because you are changing the original discussion topic in the process. That will affect the way the examiner views your restatement as being close or not to the original discussion presentation. You should also learn to provide a proper topic outline in response to the 2 discussion being asked (the problems and how the problems can be solved).

When writing this type of essay, you should use 2 connected topics first, then give a cohesive example to support your information. That way you create a clear, cohesive, and coherent paragraph. The format is:

Sentence 1: 1st topic
Sentence 2: Explanation
Sentence 3: Transition to the next topic
Sentence 4: New topic
Sentence 5: Example that connects the 2 topics in the paragraph

When the above format is not used, the essay tends to come across as under developed and lacking in clear explanation or examples. You need to show that you have the ability to create a connected discussion presentation in each paragraph. The same approach could have been used for a stronger solutions paragraph in the second reasoning presentation.

Your conclusion needs work. For this type of essay, you need to offer 5 sentences composed of:
Sentence 1: topic restatement
Sentence 2: first problem restatement
Sentence 3: second problem restatement
Sentence 4: first solution restatement
Sentence 5: second solution restatement

The reverse paraphrase, as shown in the above format, will allow you to be considered for a higher TA score as you will be able to show how you can restate the topic in 2 different ways. Thus assuring the examiner that you have ample English skills in terms of LR and GRA considerations.