Everyone should be allowed to attend university free of charge

The question of whether everyone should have access to free university education is
a controversial topic. While some advocate for eliminating tuition fees to increase
educational opportunities, I firmly believe that students should contribute financially
to their higher education. This essay will shed light on this opinion by providing two
main reasons.

First and foremost, the implementation of free tuition is often limited to developed
countries and developing ones. Universities which have the ability to offer free
university programs mostly come from developed countries, especially in the
European regions, such as Germany. This nation has high living standards and
robust economies, which leads to beneficial welfare for citizens in many aspects of
life including education. In contrast, developing and underdeveloped countries,
particularly in some regions in Africa and Asia, face numerous challenges beyond
education, including poverty, political instability and so on. Therefore, implementing
free tuition in these contexts could endanger national budgets.

Furthermore, in this modern world, universities operate as complex business models
that require significant financial resources to function effectively. Hence, they must
allocate funds for various purposes, including faculty salaries, research,
infrastructure maintenance, and the research and developmet process. These
expenses are substantial and cannot be solely covered by government support or
donations. Charging tuition fees ensures a sustainable revenue stream that allows
universities to maintain high-quality education and services.

In conclusion, while free tuition can be an ideal goal, it is essential to consider the
practical side of implementing such a policy. By charging tuition fees, universities can
ensure their sustainability and provide a quality education for students. To address
the financial challenges faced by many students, universities can prioritize
scholarships, financial aid programs, and partnerships with governments and
organizations to support those in need.

You are not being asked to state an opinion regarding the status of the public discussion of this topic. Therefore, you should not be stating anything regarding this most specially at the start of the prompt restatement. This creates an inaccurate restatement as there is no reference to such an opinion in the original presentation. It affects the accuracy of your restatement in a negative manner.


It is important to create the best reasoning overview for your presentation in the writer's opinion section. You gain extra points for delivering a valid thesis statement composed of the 2 reasons that you will be discussing in the reasoning paragraphs. It helps to create a summary of the discussion that appropriately responds to the task writing requirement. The strongest reasoning that you could provide should relate to the free education status in your own country. That way you gain extra points for personal knowledge and experience reference points in the actual discussion

The discussion you posed covers a general hypothesis which, like I mentioned above, is more difficult to discuss as you are not basing your information on personal insight and relevant experiences. Examiners always give extra points when the writing relates to direct knowledge from the writer. If you can indicate how this relates to your own college considerations, then it will gain the best possible points in an actual test.