The figures illustrate the roads though which people can reach to the City Hospital in 2007 & 2010

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The figures illustrate the roads though which people can reach to the City Hospital in 2007 and the changes that have been made in 2010.

In 2007, City Hospital was enclosed by a Ring Road. From the South of the Hospital, Hospital Road met the City Road, also located on the south. There are several bus stops alongside the Hospital Road. Public and staff parked their cars in the same parking space on the right side of Hospital Road which could be accessed through the Ring Road.

In 2010, a roundabout has been constructed at the intersection of the hospital road and the Ring Road at the entrance to the City Hospital. Another roundabout has also been added at the intersection between city road and the hospital road. The bus stops which were alongside the hospital road have been removed and the two roundabouts have been connected by a bus station instead. Apart from that, public and staff parking area have been distinguished. A separate public parking space has been made just beside the Ring Road, toward East. The public can enter the parking space from the Ring Road.

• 
  111min.PNG
  

For clarity purposes, you must indicate the number of images and also, indicate if there is an image that is based on a revised presentation. That way you clearly lead the reader into the actual descriptive report in the later paragraphs.


This reference makes it appear that physical changes, rather than route changes were made to the city hospital access. That is not the case. There were route designation changes made. Be clear when it comes to information referencing because errors in this part will tend to confuse the reader.

Aside from a few clarity errors, the writer has pretty much explained the differences between the two maps quite well. Word usage could have been better in aid of clarity. The writer shows the potential to deliver a well developed report, provided he learns to use more descriptive words in the correct manner.