In this contemporary society, the issue of mitigating illegal conducts has ignited a controversy among governmental bodies around the world. While some believe that the most effective way is to give longer prison sentences, others argue that stricter legislation, such as community service or joining in rehabilitation, can reduce crime. This essay will delve into the rationales of each perspective before giving my own opinion supporting the latter idea.
On one hand, stricter penalties like longer prison sentences can be a powerful deterrent for potential criminals. Clearly, the fear of prolonged loss of freedom can force one to think twice before committing a crime. Additionally, incarcerating offenders for extended periods will ensure the peace of the community without potential risks which can harm residents. To illustrate, in certain nations like Japan, where stringent laws were enacted by governmental bodies to shield the population, the prevalence of criminals has experienced a downward trend. This indicates that giving longer prison sentences can contribute to safety effectively.
On the other hand, those who value alternative methods highlight the importance of addressed root causes. Once criminals engage in community work, vocational training, or psychological therapy, they can be given a chance to learn hard, change their mindset with positive messages, eventually reintegrate into society. As a result, urgent problems such as lack of education, mental health problems, or insufficient life skills can be tackled at the beginning. Criminals are also less likely to reoffend after participating in these rehabilitation programs or community service, which helps reduce crime rate more sustainability than just imprisonment.
From my stance, although more severe regulations like longer prison sentences can alleviate illegal conducts, different methods are proven to be successful in the long term. While imprisonment can ensure safety for extended periods, the latter solution can address the root causes, reducing crime rates and offering more services without paying extra fees.
In conclusion, while longer prison sentences may help curb crime to some extent, other methods like rehabilitation or community work are considered to be effective, addressing the root causes of criminal behaviours rather than just focusing on consequences. Therefore, policy makers should be more inclined towards alternative methods to create a more inclusive and safer society.
On one hand, stricter penalties like longer prison sentences can be a powerful deterrent for potential criminals. Clearly, the fear of prolonged loss of freedom can force one to think twice before committing a crime. Additionally, incarcerating offenders for extended periods will ensure the peace of the community without potential risks which can harm residents. To illustrate, in certain nations like Japan, where stringent laws were enacted by governmental bodies to shield the population, the prevalence of criminals has experienced a downward trend. This indicates that giving longer prison sentences can contribute to safety effectively.
On the other hand, those who value alternative methods highlight the importance of addressed root causes. Once criminals engage in community work, vocational training, or psychological therapy, they can be given a chance to learn hard, change their mindset with positive messages, eventually reintegrate into society. As a result, urgent problems such as lack of education, mental health problems, or insufficient life skills can be tackled at the beginning. Criminals are also less likely to reoffend after participating in these rehabilitation programs or community service, which helps reduce crime rate more sustainability than just imprisonment.
From my stance, although more severe regulations like longer prison sentences can alleviate illegal conducts, different methods are proven to be successful in the long term. While imprisonment can ensure safety for extended periods, the latter solution can address the root causes, reducing crime rates and offering more services without paying extra fees.
In conclusion, while longer prison sentences may help curb crime to some extent, other methods like rehabilitation or community work are considered to be effective, addressing the root causes of criminal behaviours rather than just focusing on consequences. Therefore, policy makers should be more inclined towards alternative methods to create a more inclusive and safer society.
