Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today's increasingly global vocation, every nations around the world do not only try hard in developing their countries, but also simultaneously support, invest to each other. Rich countries hold a certain responsibility in leveling up facilities 's others. The basis for these opinions are personal and social
Personally, the citizen in each countries could get multiple beneficial value from abroad nations. In order words, there is truly a movement toward greater justice of human rights. For example, the poor regions resident could be given jobs, facilities or even money, leading to better life. Furthermore, people in developed countries enhanced much broad productions were satisfied their needs.
Socially, when developed countries decide to help other countries surely, they may be out of control. This means that they are bound to be many risk, for instance, our-sourcing, what's more, inflicted damage on finance resulting in debt. Additionally, corruption remaining obviously is like a well-know thing. However, if they manage their resources professionally, they might get much more advantages from their investing. Indeed, there is a tremendous increase in their standard of living, leads to improvements or innovations.
In conclusion, supportive responsibility does not forced upon rich countries, but that ought to be performed in current context. It seems that rich people should help poor people, which is a dimession to tend to more justice.
In today's increasingly global vocation, every nations around the world do not only try hard in developing their countries, but also simultaneously support, invest to each other. Rich countries hold a certain responsibility in leveling up facilities 's others. The basis for these opinions are personal and social
Personally, the citizen in each countries could get multiple beneficial value from abroad nations. In order words, there is truly a movement toward greater justice of human rights. For example, the poor regions resident could be given jobs, facilities or even money, leading to better life. Furthermore, people in developed countries enhanced much broad productions were satisfied their needs.
Socially, when developed countries decide to help other countries surely, they may be out of control. This means that they are bound to be many risk, for instance, our-sourcing, what's more, inflicted damage on finance resulting in debt. Additionally, corruption remaining obviously is like a well-know thing. However, if they manage their resources professionally, they might get much more advantages from their investing. Indeed, there is a tremendous increase in their standard of living, leads to improvements or innovations.
In conclusion, supportive responsibility does not forced upon rich countries, but that ought to be performed in current context. It seems that rich people should help poor people, which is a dimession to tend to more justice.