There is a such tendency in the world that wealthier nations aids to poorer and underdeveloped nations as financial ,food,educational aids etc...In the times of crises ,revolutions and dissatisfaction the question always arises that why do rich countries not help the poor? Why do they not share their wealth to make the world a better place to live?
Citizens of both wealthy nations and poorer nations are human beings and we are all living together in one world so we cannot be careless about the situation of people in poor countries. In a globalizing world all nations become more dependent on each other.Problems which have occurred in poorer countries are spreaded and influence to others and this in turn becomes a more global problem.Such humanitarian aids prevent mass migrations and future civil wars from this part of world.
At the same time supported countries may be turn to one of the biggest consumer of wealthier nations .This in turn can be considered as strategical aid.
On the other hand these supported countries must seek ways for development and become independent from other countries' money.For instance: Austria and Japan had been financed after World War Second for reconstruction and development of destroyed countries under the Europian Recovery Program which had been created by the government of USA and better known as the Marshall plan.In the result of these countries' determination , at present, they are well- developed countries .
All facts considered,I think that wealthier nations should help poorer nations but only by letting them help themselves. Teach them how to grow crops instead of just giving them food, show them how to get clean water supplies instead of just sending them trucks of water, and to try opening dialogues with their governments on how to improve their school systems. As the proverb says 'Give a man a fish, he has lunch for a day. Teach a man to fish, he has lunch everyday.' In my personal opinion is that this way will be much more helpful to poorer nations than just sharing their profits.
Wait for your suggestions...Thanks in advance
Citizens of both wealthy nations and poorer nations are human beings and we are all living together in one world so we cannot be careless about the situation of people in poor countries. In a globalizing world all nations become more dependent on each other.Problems which have occurred in poorer countries are spreaded and influence to others and this in turn becomes a more global problem.Such humanitarian aids prevent mass migrations and future civil wars from this part of world.
At the same time supported countries may be turn to one of the biggest consumer of wealthier nations .This in turn can be considered as strategical aid.
On the other hand these supported countries must seek ways for development and become independent from other countries' money.For instance: Austria and Japan had been financed after World War Second for reconstruction and development of destroyed countries under the Europian Recovery Program which had been created by the government of USA and better known as the Marshall plan.In the result of these countries' determination , at present, they are well- developed countries .
All facts considered,I think that wealthier nations should help poorer nations but only by letting them help themselves. Teach them how to grow crops instead of just giving them food, show them how to get clean water supplies instead of just sending them trucks of water, and to try opening dialogues with their governments on how to improve their school systems. As the proverb says 'Give a man a fish, he has lunch for a day. Teach a man to fish, he has lunch everyday.' In my personal opinion is that this way will be much more helpful to poorer nations than just sharing their profits.
Wait for your suggestions...Thanks in advance
